Back

COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease) Outbreak Prediction Using a Susceptible-Exposed-Symptomatic Infected-Recovered-Super Spreaders-Asymptomatic Infected-Deceased-Critical (SEIR-PADC) Dynamic Model

Sedaghat, A.; MOSAVI, A.

2020-12-22 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.12.20.20240507 medRxiv
Show abstract

Extension of SIR type models has been reported in a number of publications in mathematics community. But little is done on validation of these models to fit adequately with multiple clinical data of an infectious disease. In this paper, we introduce SEIR-PAD model to assess susceptible, exposed, infected, recovered, super-spreader, asymptomatic infected, and deceased populations. SEIR-PAD model consists of 7-set of ordinary differential equations with 8 unknown coefficients which are solved numerically in MATLAB using an optimization algorithm to fit 4-set of COVID-19 clinical data consist of cumulative populations of infected, deceased, recovered, and susceptible. Trends of COVID-19 in Trends in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries are successfully predicted using available data from outbreak until 23rd June 2020. Promising results of SEIR-PAD model provide insight into better management of COVID-19 pandemic in GCC countries.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.7%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
● 23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Infectious Disease Modelling
○ 54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
Similar papers in this journal
5
JMIRx Med
◐ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.4%
8
Nonlinear Dynamics
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
10
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
Mathematical Biosciences
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
○ 148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
BioMed Research International
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
15
BMC Research Notes
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
16
Journal of Theoretical Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
18
Epidemiology and Infection
◐ 89 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
BMC Infectious Diseases
○ 133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
Environmental Research
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
23
Cureus
○ 68 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
Applied Sciences
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
26
PLOS Global Public Health
● 344 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
27
Viruses
○ 332 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
Mathematics
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.