COVID-19 prediction in South Africa: Understanding the unascertained cases -- the hidden part of the epidemiological iceberg
Gu, X.; Mukherjee, B.; Das, S.; Datta, J.
Show abstract
Understanding the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions as well as acscounting for the unascertained cases remain critical challenges for epidemiological models for understanding the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 spread. In this paper, we propose a new epidemiological model (eSEIRD) that extends the widely used epidemiological models such as extended Susceptible-Infected-Removed model (eSIR) and SAPHIRE (initially developed and used for analyzing data from Wuhan). We fit these models to the daily ascertained infected (and removed) cases from March 15, 2020 to Dec 31, 2020 in South Africa that reported the largest number of confirmed COVID-19 cases and deaths from the WHO African region. Using the eSEIRD model, the COVID-19 transmission dynamics in South Africa was characterized by the estimated basic reproduction number (R0) starting at 3.22 (95%CrI: [3.19, 3.23]) then dropping below 2 following a mandatory lockdown implementation and subsequently increasing to 3.27 (95%CrI: [3.27, 3.27]) by the end of 2020. The initial decrease of effective reproduction number followed by an increase suggest the effectiveness of early interventions and the combined effect of relaxing strict interventions and emergence of a new coronavirus variant in South Africa. The low estimated ascertainment rate was found to vary from 1.65% to 9.17% across models and time periods. The overall infection fatality ratio (IFR) was estimated as 0.06% (95%CrI: [0.04%, 0.22%]) accounting for unascertained cases and deaths while the reported case fatality ratio was 2.88% (95% CrI: [2.45%, 6.01%]). The models predict that from December 31, 2020, to April 1, 2021, the predicted cumulative number of infected would reach roughly 70% of total population in South Africa. Besides providing insights on the COVID-19 dynamics in South Africa, we develop powerful forecasting tools that enable estimation of ascertainment rates and IFR while quantifying the effect of intervention measures on COVID-19 spread. AMS ClassificationPlace Classification here. Leave as is, if there is no classification
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying epidemiological drivers of gambiense human African Trypanosomiasis across the Democratic Republic of Congo 97%
- A mechanistic and data-driven reconstruction of the time-varying reproduction number: Application to the COVID-19 epidemic 96%
- Modelling to explore the potential impact of asymptomatic human infections on transmission and dynamics of African sleeping sickness 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling the early phase of the Belgian COVID-19 epidemic using a stochastic compartmental model and studying its implied future trajectories 96%
- Assessing the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Belgium by means of an extended SEIQRD model and public mobility data 96%
- The COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Switzerland and its impact on disease spread 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating COVID-19 reporting data in the context of testing strategies across 31 LMICs 94%
- Estimating the undetected infections in the Covid-19 outbreak by harnessing capture-recapture methods 93%
- Impact of reproduction number on multiwave spreading dynamics of COVID-19 with temporary immunity : a mathematical model 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.