Back

Foistar(Camostat mesylate) associated with the significant decrease in CRP levels compared to Kaletra(Lopinavir/Ritonavir) treatment in Korean mild COVID-19 pneumonic patients.

Choi, J.-P.; Choi, J.-P.; Kim, H.-J.; Han, J.; Park, S.; Han, J.

2020-12-15 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.12.10.20240689 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThere is limited information due to absence of virus titer and symptom related changes. Nonetheless, this is the first comparative study between the use of Foistar (Camostat mesilate) and Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir) on COVID-19 infection. MethodsPatients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing that were admitted to Seoul Medical Center (Seoul, South Korea) where is the largest public medical center in South Korea between August 1 and September 20, 2020 were included The data of the patients with pneumonia who received Foistar (Foistar group) during their hospitalization period were primarily collected, and the patients who received Kaletra (Kaletra group) during their hospitalization period were matched to have a similar age group to that of Foistar group so that three times the number of Foistar group patients were randomly selected into Kaletra group and their body temperature, CRP level, WBC count, and event of diarrhea were collected, accordingly. ResultsA total of 29 patients (7 Foistar group and 22 Kaletra group) was included. The median age was 69, and all had mild COVID-19 (WHO ordinal scale 3 or 4) on admission. 6 patients out of 7 patients (85.71%) from Foistar group who exhibited elevated CRP levels (CRP >0.4mg/dL) on admission have controlled their CRP levels to the normal range. In Kaletra group, 11 out of 18 patients (61.11%) have controlled their CRP levels to the normal range, and only 1 of 2 patients (50.00%) who had normal CRP level has maintained his or her normal CRP level. The difference in the white blood cell counts was not significant between two groups. None of the patients in the study had hyperkalemia. ConclusionThis study has found a probable association of controlling inflammatory reactions and fever in COVID-19 patients with Foistar (camostat mesilate) use. In addition, there was no significant adverse drug event found from this study upon the Foistar use. These results may encourage the use of Foistar as a treatment option for the patients with mild to moderate COVID-19.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
2
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
3
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
4
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.3%
7
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
9
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
17
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
19
Virologica Sinica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
20
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
22
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
25
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
29
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%