Workflow for Protein N-terminal Acetylation and C-terminal Amidation Application using CcpNmr Analysis v2.4 Platform and Aria2.3 Structure Calculation Software
Silva, B. M.; Santos, B. P. O.; de Magalhaes, M. T. Q.
Show abstract
Structural biology is a field that enables a better understanding of proteins from scratch. From the available techniques, solution NMR is one well established that provides structure, dynamics and protein-molecules interaction. In a NMR lab routine, from data acquisition until protein/mechanisms elucidation comes a process that can undergo months. During the past decades, different tools were developed for NMR data processing, peaks assignment, structure elucidation and data submission. Since many of these programs demand great computational skills, a few groups have tried to combine those programs and make them more friendly and useful, what can possibilite a faster process. Here we highlight CCPNMR2.4 analysis and ARIA2.3, responsible for peak assignment and structure calculation, respectively, and can work associated. Although being academic free and the possibility of working with a GUI interface, the common N-terminal acetylation and C-terminal amidation modifications are not implemented in a way that possibilities to work with them in combination, what results in a dilemma. This work brings visual data that evidences the low usability of CCPN and ARIA with N-terminal acetylated and C-terminal amidated proteins and propose a workflow to overcome this problem, which may improve the usage of both software in the mentioned versions and facilitate the lab users already used to these programs. As a proof of concept, we have chosen a N-terminal amidated peptide, L-Phenylseptin, whose structure has already been solved with other programs. Statistical data shows that no significant difference was found with the structure obtained with the new protocol. In conclusion, we exhibit a new protocol that can be used in combination with CCPNMR2.4 and ARIA2.3 for protein with the mentioned modifications and it successfully works and manipulates these molecules.
Matching journals
The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Phage libraries screening on P53: yield improvement by zinc and a new parasites integrating analysis and rationale 95%
- Navigating the Unstructured by Evaluating AlphaFold's Efficacy in Predicting Missing Residues and Structural Disorder in Proteins 95%
- Using AlphaFold to predict the impact of single mutations on protein stability and function 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolutionary Models of Amino Acid Substitutions Based on the Tertiary Structure of their Neighborhoods 94%
- Interfacial residues in protein-protein complexes are in the eyes of the beholder 94%
- Fine Tuning Rigid Body Docking Results Using the Dreiding Force Field: A Computational Study of 36 Known Nanobody-Protein Complexes 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.