Investigating the effects of accelerated partner therapy (APT) on chlamydia transmission in Britain: a mathematical modelling study
Althaus, C. L.; Mercer, C. H.; Cassell, J. A.; Estcourt, C. S.; Low, N.
Show abstract
Understanding the effects of partner notification (PN) on the transmission of chlamydia, the most prevalent bacterial sexual transmitted infection worldwide, is critical for implementing optimal control strategies. Accelerated partner therapy (APT) aims to increase the numbers of partners treated and reduce the time to partner treatment. Our objective was to study the effects of APT interventions on partner treatment and chlamydia transmission in order to better understand the results of LUSTRUM, an APT cross-over cluster randomised controlled trial in the UK. We developed a novel deterministic, population-based chlamydia transmission model including the process of PN. We considered a population aged 16-34 years and calibrated the model to sexual behaviour data between people of the opposite-sex and chlamydia prevalence data reported by 3,671 participants in Britains third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3, 2010-2012) using Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC). We investigated the potential effects of APT on chlamydia transmission by increasing the number of treated partners and reducing the time to partner treatment compared to standard PN. The median prevalence of chlamydia in the model was 1.84% (95% credible interval, CrI: 1.60%-2.62%) in women and 1.78% (95% CrI: 1.13%-2.14%) in men. Chlamydia positivity was highest in partners of symptomatic index cases with low sexual activity. Infected partners were typically asymptomatic and belonged to the high sexual activity group, i.e., are naturally those infected individuals that will contribute most to onward transmission. Reducing the time to partner treatment without achieving higher numbers of partners treated had only minor effects on reducing chlamydia prevalence. In contrast, the model predicts that a potential increase in the number of partners treated from current levels in Britain (0.51, 95% CrI: 0.21-0.80) by 25% would reduce chlamydia prevalence by 18% (95% CrI: 5%-44%) in both women in men within 5 years. These results suggest that APT, through a potential increase in the proportion of partners treated, would be an effective method to reduce ongoing chlamydia transmission in Britain.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of sexual risk behaviour and STI co-infection dynamics on the evolution of HIV set point viral load in MSM 93%
- Using next generation matrices to estimate the proportion of cases that are not detected in an outbreak 93%
- Limited impact of contact tracing in a University setting for COVID-19 due to asymptomatic transmission and social distancing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimation of the force of infection and infectious period of skin sores in remote Australian communities using interval-censored data 93%
- Modelling Disease Mitigation at Mass Gatherings: A Case Study of COVID-19 at the 2022 FIFA World Cup 92%
- Detecting and quantifying heterogeneity in susceptibility using contact tracing data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 during periods of high, low and zero case incidence 91%
- Identifying Plasmodium falciparum transmission patterns through parasite prevalence and entomological inoculation rate 91%
- Physiology and ecology together regulate host and vector importance for Ross River virus and other vector-borne diseases 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the impact of reopening schools on the reproduction number of SARS-CoV-2 in England, using weekly contact survey data 91%
- Evaluating the COVID-19 responses of Belgium, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom, February-June 2020: A counterfactual modelling study 90%
- Interventions to control nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.