Back

Diagnostic and monitoring utilities of saliva for SARS-CoV-2

Abdulrahman, A.; Albastaki, A.; AlAwadhi, A. I.; AlWazzan, A.; AlQahtani, M.

2020-12-07 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.12.07.20244681 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionNasopharyngeal (NP) swab is an invasive procedure that is difficult to perform in pediatric cases and those with special needs. On the other hand, saliva has been a proposed sample given the ease of collection, comfort and the ability to self-collect. The research project aims to study the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the saliva of suspected COVID-19 patients in comparison to its presence in NP swabs. MethodologyA cross-sectional study was conducted in October 2020 in COVID19 clinic in the Bahrain Defense Force Hospital. The study compared the presence of SARS-CoV2 by PCR in saliva samples to nasopharyngeal samples. COVID-19 Clinic tests symptomatic, staff, close contacts and pre-operation patients. ResultsThe saliva PCR has shown a sensitivity of 72.9% (95% CI: 58.2% - 84.7%) and a specificity of 98.8% (95% CI: 97.8% - 99.4%). The PPV was 74.5% (95% CI 59.7% to 86.1%) and the NPV was 98.6% (95% CI 97.7% to 99.3%). Kappa coefficient of agreement between saliva and NP was 0.723 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.82, p<0.001). Moreover, when restricting cases to symptomatic only, the sensitivity of saliva increased to 86.7% (95% CI 59.5% to 98.3%) while specificity remained high at 97.2%. ConclusionThe findings of the study suggest that saliva samples have the potential to be used as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2, especially in symptomatic individuals. This is especially important when it is difficult to collect NP samples. Saliva samples are however at risk of producing more false negative tests.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.2%
2
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.7%
4
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
5
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
6
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
7
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
8
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
12
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Journal of Clinical Virology Plus
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
20
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
22
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
24
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%