Back

Integrated phenotypic and mutational approach defines EBF3-related HADD syndrome genotype-phenotype relationships

Deisseroth, C. A.; Nayak, A.; Bliss, N. D.; Lerma, V.; Lemaire, A. W.; Narayanan, V.; Balak, C.; Zanni, G.; Valente, E. M.; Bertini, E.; Benke, P. J.; Wangler, M. F.; Chao, H.-T.

2020-12-29 neurology
10.1101/2020.12.07.20238691 medRxiv
Show abstract

Hypotonia, Ataxia, and Delayed Development syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by heterozygous Early B-Cell Factor 3 (EBF3) loss-of-function variants. Identified in 2016, the full spectrum of clinical findings and the relationship between the EBF3 genotype and clinical outcomes has not been determined beyond its namesake features. We combined a phenotypic assessment of 33 individuals molecularly diagnosed with EBF3 pathogenic variants with a meta-analysis of 34 previously reported individuals. The combined 62 unique individuals enabled comparative cross-sectional phenotype and genotype analysis in the largest cohort to date of affected individuals. Cardinal distinguishing features were identified that facilitate phenotypic stratification for clinical diagnosis. We developed assessment scales to ascertain individuals at risk for pathogenic EBF3 variants, stratify the clinical severity, and connect variant-specific molecular phenotypes to clinical outcomes. Our findings show that a specific class of EBF3 variants affecting the evolutionarily conserved Zinc Finger (ZNF) motif, which is critical for stabilizing the protein interaction with the DNA target sequence, is associated with an increased risk of persistent motor and language impairments. These findings highlight the impact of combining variant-specific molecular phenotypes with comprehensive clinical data to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes and potentially guide personalized decisions for therapeutic interventions.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.