Back

Model for evaluating cost-effectiveness of surveillance testing for SARS-CoV2

Silver, J.

2020-12-04 health economics
10.1101/2020.12.02.20242644 medRxiv
Show abstract

Testing people without symptoms for SARS-CoV-2 followed by isolation of those who test positive could mitigate the covid-19 epidemic pending arrival of an effective vaccine. Key questions for such programs are who should be tested, how often, and when should such testing stop. Answers to these questions depend on test and population characteristics. A cost-effectiveness model that provides answers depending on user-adjustable parameter values is described. Key parameters are the value ascribed to preventing a death and the reproduction number (roughly, rate of spread) at the time surveillance testing is initiated. For current rates of spread, cost-effectiveness usually requires a value per life saved greater than $100,000 and depends critically on the extent and frequency of testing.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.0%
2
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
6
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
8
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
13
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
14
npj Vaccines
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
15
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
16
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.7%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
19
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
21
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
22
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Journal of Medical Economics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
25
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
26
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%