Back

Model for evaluating cost-effectiveness of surveillance testing for SARS-CoV2

Silver, J.

2020-12-04 health economics
10.1101/2020.12.02.20242644 medRxiv
Show abstract

Testing people without symptoms for SARS-CoV-2 followed by isolation of those who test positive could mitigate the covid-19 epidemic pending arrival of an effective vaccine. Key questions for such programs are who should be tested, how often, and when should such testing stop. Answers to these questions depend on test and population characteristics. A cost-effectiveness model that provides answers depending on user-adjustable parameter values is described. Key parameters are the value ascribed to preventing a death and the reproduction number (roughly, rate of spread) at the time surveillance testing is initiated. For current rates of spread, cost-effectiveness usually requires a value per life saved greater than $100,000 and depends critically on the extent and frequency of testing.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.9%
2
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.6%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 8%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.4%
8
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
10
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.8%
14
Statistics in Medicine
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Epidemiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Value in Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
Journal of Medical Economics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Emerging Infectious Diseases
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Vaccine: X
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
26
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Eurosurveillance
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%