Back

Food insecurity during COVID-19: A multi-state research collaborative

Niles, M. T.; Belarmino, E. H.; Bertmann, F.; Biehl, E.; Acciai, F.; Josephson, A. L.; Ohri-Vachaspati, P.; Neff, R.

2020-12-04 nutrition
10.1101/2020.12.01.20242024 medRxiv
Show abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had profound impacts on the global food system, supply chain, and employment, which, in turn, has created numerous challenges to food access and food security. Early exploratory studies suggest significant increases in food insecurity in the United States. Comprehensive longitudinal research across multiple locations is needed to understand the range of impacts and responses at the household level and to improve preparedness for future events. This protocol paper outlines the formation of the National Food Access and COVID research Team (NFACT), a collaborative, interdisciplinary, multi-state research effort that will utilize common measurement tools, codebooks, code, data aggregation tools, and outreach materials to collectively examine and communicate the effect of COVID-19 on household food access and security. NFACT is led by an executive committee of researchers from four institutions, with additional NFACT collaborating institutions across more than a dozen states. A survey was developed by the NFACT executive team in March 2020, with additional refinements in May 2020, using both existing validated questions and new original questions, which were piloted and validated in Vermont. The project provides suggestive guidance for recruitment, and is designed to allow each study site to adopt recruitment strategies that meet their budget and needs. Primary outcomes of interest include food security status, employment status, food access challenges and concerns, dietary intake, and use of food assistance programs. Additional outcomes assess emotional eating, stigma, COVID-19 perceptions and experiences, and pro-environmental purchasing behaviors. This protocol and the establishment of NFACT provide important advancements in COVID-19 and food security research by generating harmonized data and assessing comparable outcomes across geographies and time. The collaborative, open-source approach makes research tools available to teams who might not have the resources to design their own tools, and can enable streamlined data collection, large-scale comparative analyses, and cost savings through reduced administrative tasks. The project has contributed to building new networks between and within states. Enabling facilitation and implementation of instruments in study sites has provided flexibility and meaningful opportunity for local stakeholder engagement and relevant outreach for informed public health decision-making.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
50.1%
50% of probability mass above
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.8%
3
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
5
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
7
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
8
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
10
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
11
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
13
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
14
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
22
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%