Food insecurity during COVID-19: A multi-state research collaborative
Niles, M. T.; Belarmino, E. H.; Bertmann, F.; Biehl, E.; Acciai, F.; Josephson, A. L.; Ohri-Vachaspati, P.; Neff, R.
Show abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has had profound impacts on the global food system, supply chain, and employment, which, in turn, has created numerous challenges to food access and food security. Early exploratory studies suggest significant increases in food insecurity in the United States. Comprehensive longitudinal research across multiple locations is needed to understand the range of impacts and responses at the household level and to improve preparedness for future events. This protocol paper outlines the formation of the National Food Access and COVID research Team (NFACT), a collaborative, interdisciplinary, multi-state research effort that will utilize common measurement tools, codebooks, code, data aggregation tools, and outreach materials to collectively examine and communicate the effect of COVID-19 on household food access and security. NFACT is led by an executive committee of researchers from four institutions, with additional NFACT collaborating institutions across more than a dozen states. A survey was developed by the NFACT executive team in March 2020, with additional refinements in May 2020, using both existing validated questions and new original questions, which were piloted and validated in Vermont. The project provides suggestive guidance for recruitment, and is designed to allow each study site to adopt recruitment strategies that meet their budget and needs. Primary outcomes of interest include food security status, employment status, food access challenges and concerns, dietary intake, and use of food assistance programs. Additional outcomes assess emotional eating, stigma, COVID-19 perceptions and experiences, and pro-environmental purchasing behaviors. This protocol and the establishment of NFACT provide important advancements in COVID-19 and food security research by generating harmonized data and assessing comparable outcomes across geographies and time. The collaborative, open-source approach makes research tools available to teams who might not have the resources to design their own tools, and can enable streamlined data collection, large-scale comparative analyses, and cost savings through reduced administrative tasks. The project has contributed to building new networks between and within states. Enabling facilitation and implementation of instruments in study sites has provided flexibility and meaningful opportunity for local stakeholder engagement and relevant outreach for informed public health decision-making.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement lessons of a repeated cross-sectional household food insecurity survey during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico 93%
- A novel food frequency questionnaire for Brazilian adults based on the Nova classification system: development, reproducibility and validation 92%
- A novel web-based 24-hour dietary recall tool in line with the Nova food processing classification: description and evaluation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation and enforcement of mandatory calorie labelling regulations for the out-of-home sector in England: qualitative study of the experiences of business implementers and regulatory enforcers 93%
- A randomised controlled trial to test the effects of fish aggregating devices and SBC activities promoting fish consumption in Timor-Leste: A study protocol 93%
- Integrating co-design into formative research for a SBCC entry-point platform for nutrition-sensitive social protection programs in low -and middle-income country settings. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in household food security, access to health services, and income in northern Lao PDR during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Examining the associations between the food environment and dietary intake in British Columbia: A cross-sectional study 92%
- Development and validation protocol for an instrument to measure women’s empowerment in urban sanitation across countries: The Agency, Resources, and Institutional Structures for Sanitation-related Empowerment (ARISE) Scales 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Home Food Procurement Impacts Food Security and Diet Quality during COVID-19 94%
- A mixed methods study evaluating food insecurity and diet quality in households accessing food aid in England 93%
- A comparative national-level analysis of government food system resilience activities in preparation for future food system disruptions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic Observation Of COVID-19 Mitigation (Socom): Assessing Face Covering And Distancing In Schools 89%
- Precision risk assessment for pediatric hospitalization using address-level data in Cincinnati, Ohio 89%
- A Retrospective Case Study of Successful Translational Research: Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment, Experiences in Community Engagement 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.