Back

Prediction of evolution of the second wave of Covid-19 pandemic in Italy

Ciufolini, I.; Paolozzi, A.

2020-11-28 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.11.24.20238139 medRxiv
Show abstract

A relevant problem in the study of the Covid-19 pandemic is the study of its temporal evolution. Such evolution depends on a number of factors, among which the average rate of contacts between susceptible and infected individuals, the duration of infectiousness and the transmissibility, that is the probability of infection after a contact between susceptible and infected individuals. In a previous study, we analyzed the potentiality of a number of distributions to describe the evolution of the pandemic and the potentiality of each distribution to mathematically predict the evolution of the pandemic in Italy. Since the number of daily tests was changing and increasing with time, we used the ratio of the new daily cases per swab. We considered distributions of the type of Gauss (normal), Gamma, Beta, Weibull, Lognormal and in addition of the type of the Planck blackbody radiation law. The Planck law, describing the amount of energy of the electromagnetic radiation emitted by a black body at each wavelength or at each frequency, marked in 1900 the beginning of Quantum Mechanics. The result of our analysis was that, among the considered distributions, the Planck law has the best potentiality to mathematically predict the evolution of the pandemic and the best fitting capability. In this paper, we analyze the time evolution of the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in Italy and in particular we predict the ratio of the new daily cases per swab at Christmas 2020 using the data in the interval from 17 Oct to 21 Nov. According to Figure 4 and Figure 8, the prediction for such a ratio around Christmas is approximately within 6% and 7%. In this study there is also an attempt to account for the effects of the governmental containment measures.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.0%
3
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.5%
5
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
6
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
7
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
9
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Nonlinear Dynamics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
12
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
13
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
14
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
19
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
COVID
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Entropy
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
29
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
30
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%