Predicting COVID19 Critical Care Beds - The London North-West University Healthcare Trust Experience
Naude, J.; Taniparthi, M.; Adams, K.; Biggin-Lamming, J.; Elias, R.; Milner, P.; Mohammed, I.; Towers, M.; Kuper, M.
Show abstract
Our trust has an urgent need to make short-term (3-4 days in advance) informed operational decisions which take into account best-practice treatment regimens and known clinical features of COVID19 inpatients. We believe that any model which is relied upon for operational decision making should have clinically identifiable parameters. Our models parameters take into account the conversion rates from acute wards into wards equipped with Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) and Mechanical Ventilation (MV), the typical time that these conversions take place and, the historical non-COVID usage of NIV and MV beds. We have observed that this clinical performance is mathematically identical to a series of linear delays on the time varying inpatient level. High frequency inpatient data, sampled [~]4 hourly, has allowed our hospital trust to predict total critical care usage up to 4 days in advance without making any assumptions on upcoming inpatients. It is based entirely upon current bed occupancy levels and measured clinical pathways. Through back-testing over the recent 4 months, the bounds of this model include 93.8% of all 4 day inpatient sequences. The average next-day error is 0.8 (95% CI: 0.44, 1.15) and so the system tends to over-predict the next day critical care inpatients by approximately 1 bed. Potential extensions to the basic model include adjustments for seasonality, case mix, probabilistic marginalisation and known discharges.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Bayesian Susceptible-Infectious-Hospitalized-Ventilated-Recovered Model to Predict Demand for COVID-19 Inpatient Care in a Large Healthcare System 93%
- Hospital Length of Stay: A cross-Specialty Analysis and Beta-Geometric Model 92%
- Sickness Absence Rates in NHS England Staff during the COVID-19 Pandemic: insights from multivariate regression and time series modelling 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Construction of a demand and capacity model for intensive care and hospital ward beds, and mortality from COVID-19 93%
- A Multi-Granular Stacked Regression for Forecasting Long-Term Demand in Emergency Departments 93%
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Staffing and Capacity Planning for SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibody Infusion Facilities: A Performance Estimation Calculator based on Discrete-Event Simulations 93%
- A Data-Driven Framework for Identifying Intensive Care Unit Admissions Colonized with Multidrug-Resistant Organisms 92%
- Accuracy of US CDC COVID-19 Forecasting Models 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emergency department admissions during COVID-19: explainable machine learning to characterise data drift and detect emergent health risks 93%
- Mitigating Machine Learning Bias Between High Income and Low-Middle Income Countries for Enhanced Model Fairness and Generalizability 92%
- Developing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Intensive Care Unit Resource Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.