A comparison of pain registration by Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale, a cross-sectional study of primary triage registration
Kolltveit, J.; Osaland, M.; Reimers, M.; Berle, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundPain is a subjective sensation; self-reporting is important for quantifying pain intensity. There are several different validated tools for this, such as Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale. In the clinic, these terms are often used as equivalent. The objective of this study was to examine correlation and agreement between the pain registration tools in triage in an emergency department. Materials and MethodsThe study was performed in the Department of Emergency Medicine at Haukeland University Hospital in the period June-August 2019. We registered the pain score with two tools in 200 unselected patients in emergency admission with pain. In addition, we registrered gender, age, triage and general department affiliation. ResultsWe found a strong correlation between the pain registration tools by Spearmans correlation test (rho=0,930, p<0,001). There were no significant difference between the pain registration tools within the subgroups. Bland-Altman analysis show agreement between the two pain registration tools. ConclusionsIn an Emergency Department triage is it acceptable to use Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale as equivalent, as long as the correct terminology is used.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pain Expectations, Experiences and Coping Strategies Used By Post-operative Patients: A Descriptive Phenomelogical Study 96%
- Development and validation of a multidimensional composite pain scale for Rabbit (CANCRS) in a clinical environment 96%
- Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Yoruba version of Oswestry disability index 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Efficacy of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone in Improving the Partial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen and Fraction of Inspired Oxygen Ratio among COVID-19 Patients 93%
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 93%
- Single-Center Hospital and Outpatient Opioid Use for Lower Extremity Arterial Disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics of patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the low back 95%
- A Systematic review and Network Meta-analysis of pharmaceutical interventions used to manage chronic pain 94%
- Beneficial influence of single-stage posterior surgery for the treatment of lumbar brucella spondylitis combined with spondylolisthesis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effects of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Hip fracture: a study protocol for randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind trial 94%
- Experiences and impact of chronic pain in South Africans living in a rural area: a qualitative study 94%
- Guided relaxation-based virtual reality versus distraction-based virtual reality or passive control for postoperative pain management in children and adolescents undergoing Nuss repair of pectus excavatum: protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (FOREVR Peds trial) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diversity of CPR manikins for basic life support education: Use of manikin sex, race, and body shape – A scoping review 90%
- Is higher-level trauma center care associated with better outcomes in patients injured by low-energy trauma? 90%
- Diagnostic accuracy of the STANDING algorithm in patients with isolated vertigo/dizziness, a multicentre prospective study (STANDING-M) 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.