Back

Evaluation of azithromycin or hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin combination therapy on cardiac conduction and function in guinea pigs

Li, X.; Tan, W.; Zheng, S.; Sun, H.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Chen, H.; Ren, X.; He, T.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, F. H.

2020-11-01 physiology
10.1101/2020.10.31.362566 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn the early stages of the coronavirus disease pandemic, the anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and the antibiotic drug azithromycin (AZM) were widely used as emerging treatments. However, controversial cardiac toxicity results obtained from clinical trials and epidemic studies suggest that the cardiotoxicity of these two drugs should be re-evaluated. In the present study, we aimed to assess the impact of a short course of AZM or HCQ + AZM combination treatment on ECG and cardiac function in healthy guinea pigs. MethodsThirty-two male guinea pigs were randomly divided into four groups: control; AZM; HCQ; and HCQ + AZM groups. At 3, 6, and 9 days after treatment, electrocardiograms (ECGs) and echocardiographic techniques were used to determine important ECG parameters and cardiac functional parameters of the left ventricle (including posterior wall thickness, end systolic/end diastolic volume, ejection fraction, and fractional shortening). ResultsAlthough AZM decreased the heart rates of guinea pigs on day 9 (under anesthetized conditions), HCQ + AZM decreased heart rates on days 3, 6, and 9. The corrected QT intervals of guinea pigs after AZM and HCQ + AZM treatments were significantly increased, compared with CON and HCQ treatment respectively, on days 3, 6, and 9. However, QRS complex durations were not significantly different between the groups. AZM significantly decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular fraction shortening (LVFS) on days 3, 6, and 9, whereas HCQ + AZM only decreased LVEF and LVFS on day 9. Posterior wall thickness and of the left ventricle in the diastolic and systolic states were not significantly different between these groups. In addition, compared with CON, AZM and HCQ decreased the EDV. And, in comparison with HCQ treatment, HCQ + AZM treatment increased ESV on day 9. ConclusionsAccording to our study, AZM significantly prolongs the QT interval and damages cardiac function. Moreover, HCQ + AZM treatment increased the risk of cardiac dysfunction compared with HCQ treatment.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.