Features of C-reactive protein in COVID-19 patients with different ages, clinical types and outcomes: a cohort study
Qu, G.; Huang, G.; Zhang, M.; Yu, H.; Song, X.; Zhu, H.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.; Pei, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundTo characterize C-reactive protein (CRP) changes features from patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to quantify the correlation between CRP value and clinical classification. MethodsThis was a bidirectional observational cohort study. All laboratory confirmed COVID-19 patients hospitalized in Xiangyang No.1 Peoples Hospital were included. Patients general information, clinical type, CRP value and outcome were collected. Patients were grouped according to the age, clinical type and outcome, and their CRP were compared. The CRP value, age gender, and clinical type were used to build a categorical regression model to investigate the association between CRP and clinical type. ResultsThe 131 patients aged 50.13{+/-}17.13 years old. There were 4 mild, 88 moderate, 21 severe and 18 critical cases. Statistical significance of CRP median exists between different clinical types and ages. There were 10 deaths and 121 cases have been discharged. The CRP in death group dramatically increased continuously until died, while increased firstly and decreased later in the survivor and survivor in critical type. The categorical regression model also showed that CRP and age had significant coefficient. During the first 15 days from symptom onset, the maximum of CRP ranged between 0.47-53.37 mg/L were related to mild combined with moderate type, ranged 53.84-107.08 mg/L were related to severe type, and 107.42-150.00 mg/L were related to the critical type. ConclusionsCRP showed different distribution feature and existed differences in various ages, clinical types and outcomes of COVID-19 patients. The features corresponded with disease progression.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory findings for patients of different age groups with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a hospital in Saudi Arabia 97%
- Laboratory Biomarkers of COVID-19 Disease Severity and Outcome: Findings from a Developing Country 96%
- COVID-19 Disease Severity and Determinants among Ethiopian Patients: A study of the Millennium COVID-19 Care Center 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is the infection of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant associated with the outcomes of COVID-19 patients? 96%
- Clinical findings in critical ill patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 in Guangdong Province, China: a multi-center, retrospective, observational study 95%
- Exploration of the link between COVID-19 and gastric cancer from the perspective of bioinformatics and systems biology 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relative expression of pro-inflammatory molecules in COVID-19 patients manifested disease severities 97%
- Probable causes and risk factors for positive SARS-CoV-2 test in recovered patients: Evidence from Brunei Darussalam 95%
- Evaluation of rapid antibody test and chest computed tomography results of COVID-19 patients: A retrospective study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of serum trace elements, macro-minerals, antioxidants, malondialdehyde and immunoglobulins in seborrheic dermatitis patients: A case-control investigation 95%
- A small H2O-soluble ingredient of royal jelly lower cholesterol levels in liver cells by suppressing squalene epoxidase 95%
- A bioinformatics approach to systematically analyze the molecular patterns of monkeypox virus-host cell interactions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expression of nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide levels in peripheral blood cells and oxidized low-density lipoprotein levels in saliva as early markers of severe dengue 95%
- Magnesium Sulfate Attenuates Lethality and Oxidative Damage Induced by Different Models of Hypoxia in Mice 95%
- Design of multi epitope-based peptide vaccine against E protein of human COVID-19: An immunoinformatics approach 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.