Community pharmacists Awareness and Attitude toward Counterfeit medicine in Khartoum Locality: Cross Sectional Survey
Wagiealla, W.; Shantier, S.; Abureid, I.; Gadkariem, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundCounterfeit medicines (CFMs) are a global problem with significant and well-documented consequences for global health and patient safety. Pharmacists, as healthcare professionals, have a vital role in combating CFMs via ensuring the effectiveness and safety of any imported and dispensed medicines. ObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to assess the extent, awareness and attitude of pharmacists in Sudan towards CFMs. MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted applying pretested and structured questionnaire and the awareness and attitude were assessed statistically. ResultsA total of 229 participants have enrolled in the study. The majority of the respondents (76%) were found to be aware about the term CFMs during practice. 59% reported their ability to distinguish CFMs from the packaging feature and cost. Unavailability of medicine and inadequate regulatory bodies control were mentioned as the main leading factors for the spread of CFMs. 86% of the respondents reported knowing that there are pharmacists who deal with counterfeit medicines believing that they are unethical (76%). 69% of the respondents mentioned pharmacists to have vital role in combating CFMs spread through increasing knowledge and education. 62% of the participants were found to have a fair awareness about CFMs. Furthermore, 56% of them showed a good attitude toward CFMs. ConclusionCurrent literature includes gaps in knowledge and attitude towards CFMs. Therefore attention and concentrated efforts are required on the part of the government, drug manufacturers and health care providers especially pharmaceutical analysts to ensure that only drugs of acceptable quality reach the patient.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Perspectives of pharmacy employees on an inappropriate use of antimicrobials in Kathmandu, Nepal 98%
- Assessment of knowledge and perception of prescribers towards rational medicine use in the Ashanti Region of Ghana 96%
- Medical Students’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Motivation towards Antimicrobial Resistance Efforts in Eastern Uganda 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Access to essential medicines for noncommunicable diseases during conflicts: the case cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and epilepsy in Northern Syria 95%
- Drug Supply Management at First-level Public Health Facilities: Case of Pyay District, Myanmar 95%
- Predictors of voluntary uptake of modern contraceptive methods in rural Sindh, Pakistan 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Incidences of poor-quality pharmaceutical products in Nepal 97%
- The impact of National Centralized Drug Procurement policy on the use of policy-related original and generic drugs in public medical institutions in China: A difference-in-difference analysis based on national database 94%
- Risk Factors for Non-Communicable Diseases among Bangladeshi Adults: An Application of Generalized Linear Mixed Model on Multilevel Demographic and Health Survey Data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Profiles of bacteria isolates and their antimicrobial resistance pattern among housemaids working in communal living residences in Jimma City, Ethiopia 93%
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: A national cross-sectional survey 92%
- Health Economic Burden of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Menstrual hygiene management practice and factors affecting it among high school females in Ambo City, Oromia state, Ethiopia, 2018: A cross-sectional mixed method. 94%
- Stakeholder Perspectives on the Adaptability of Hospital Drug Formularies to Disease Patterns: A Modified Q-Methodology Study in Vietnam 93%
- Stethoscope and non-infrared thermometer disinfection among physicians: A cross-sectional study with implications for the control of COVID-19 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.