Back

The anti-mycobacterial activity of Artemisia annua L is based on deoxyartemisinin and artemisinic acid

Bhowmick, S.; Baptista, R.; Fazakerley, D.; Whatley, K.; Hoffmann, K. F.; Shen, J.; Mur, L.

2020-10-25 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2020.10.23.352500 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The discovery of antimalarial artemisinin from Artemisia annua L. is an example of how Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) may be exploited to meet a recognized need. In this study, we systemically investigated A. annua L. for its antimicrobial activity and assessed it as a source of bioactive natural products for anti-mycobacterial activity. We used a silica gel column to perform antimicrobial activity-guided purification of the A. annua leaf, whose identity was confirmed by rbcL DNA barcoding, and used UHPLC-HRMS and NMR to elucidate the structure of purified active compounds. The antimicrobial activity of crude extracts, isolated compounds and the control artemisinin (Apollo Scientific Ltd) was assessed against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Mycobacterium smegmatis strains by serial micro dilution method (31.25-1000 g/mL). The isolated compounds were tested for synergistic effects against mycobacterium. Bioactive compounds were purified and identified as deoxyartemisinin and artemisinic acid. Artemisinic acid (MIC 250 g/mL) was more effective in comparison to deoxyartemisinin (MIC 500 g/mL) and artemisinin (MIC 1000 g/mL) against M. smegmatis. We used a molecular docking approach to investigate the interactions between selected anti-mycobacterial compounds and proteins involved in vital physiological functions in M. tuberculosis, namely MtPks13, MtPknB, MtPanK, MtKasA, MtInhA and MtDprE1 and found artemisinic acid showed docking scores superior to the control inhibiters for MtKasA, suggesting it to be a potential nick for further in vitro biological evaluation and anti-TB drug design.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.