Back

Screening and potent applicability analysis of commonly used pesticides against desert locust: an integrative entomo-informatics approach

Banik, A.; Mondal, M. F.; Khan, M. M. R.; Ahmed, S. R.; Hasan, M. M.

2020-10-21 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.10.19.345595 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The locust problem is a global threat for food security. Locusts can fly and migrate overseas within a zip and creating a large-scale devastation to the diversified agro-ecosystem. GIS based analysis showed the recent movement of locusts, among them Schistocerca gregaria and Locusta migratoria are predominant in Indian subcontinent and are found more notorious and devastating one. This devastation needs to be stopped to save human race from food deprivation. In our study, we screened some commonly used agricultural pesticides and strongly recommended three of them viz. biphenthrin, diafenthiuron and silafluofen which might be potential to control the desert locusts based on their binding affinity towards the locusts survival proteins. Our phylogenetic analysis reveals that these three recommended pesticides might also show potency to the other locust species as well as they are also way safer than the other commercially available pesticides. These proposed pesticides bioactive analogs from fungus and bacteria may also show efficacy as next generation controlling measures of locust as well as different kind of pests. These recommended pesticides are expected to be highly effective against locusts and needs to bring forward by the entomologists by performing experimental field trials. HighlightsO_LIGIS map unmasked the 2020 migratory pattern of locusts which now predominant towards Indian subcontinent. C_LIO_LIBiphenthrin, diafenthiuron and silafluofen showed maximum binding affinity. C_LIO_LIBiphenthrin and diafenthiuron were relatively safer than silafluofen. C_LIO_LIBioactive analogs from fungus and bacteria could be an alternative to control locusts. C_LIO_LIPesticides inhibition hotspots for desert locusts were unrevealed. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.