Back

Modulation of Grasp Parameters using Arbitrary Cues about Object Property in Older Adults

Rao, N.; Mehta, N.; Patel, P.; Parikh, P. J.

2020-10-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.10.19.344457 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dexterous manipulation may be guided by explicit information about object property. Such a manipulation requires fine modulation of digit position and forces using explicit cues. Young adults can form arbitrary cue-object property associations for accurate modulation of digit position and forces. Aging, in contrast, might alter this conditional learning. Older adults are impaired in accurately modulating their digit forces using explicit cues about object property. However, it is not known whether older adults can use explicit cues about object property to modulate digit position. In this study, we instructed ten healthy older and ten young adults to learn a manipulation task using arbitrary color cues about object center of mass location. Subjects were required to exert clockwise, counterclockwise, or no torque on the object according to the color cue and lift the object while minimizing its tilt across sixty trials. Older adults produced larger torque error during the conditional learning trials than young adults. This resulted in a significantly slower rate of learning in older adults. Older, but not young adults, failed to modulate their digit position and forces using the color cues. Similar aging-related differences were not observed while learning the task using implicit knowledge about object property. Our findings suggest that aging impairs the ability to use explicit cues about object property to modulate both digit position and forces for dexterous manipulation. We discuss our findings in relation to age-related changes in the processes and the neural network for conditional learning.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
9
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
10
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
11
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
15
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
16
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
19
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
24
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%