Back

Restructuring of the Immune Contexture Improves Checkpoint Blockade Efficacy in Murine Lung Cancer

Ebelt, N. D.; Zuniga, E.; Marzagalli, M.; Zamloot, V.; Blazar, B. R.; Salgia, R.; Manuel, E. R.

2020-10-10 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.10.09.332387 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Therapeutic options for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment have changed dramatically in recent years with the advent of novel immunotherapeutic approaches. Among these, immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), using monoclonal antibodies, has shown tremendous promise in a small proportion of patients. In order to better predict patients that will respond to ICB treatment, biomarkers such as tumor-associated CD8+ T cell frequency, tumor checkpoint protein status and mutational burden have been utilized, however, with mixed success. In this study, we hypothesized that significantly altering the suppressive tumor immune landscape in NSCLC could potentially improve ICB efficacy. Using sub-therapeutic doses of our Salmonella typhimurium-based therapy targeting the suppressive molecule indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (shIDO-ST) in tumor-bearing mice, we observed dramatic changes in immune subset phenotypes that included increases in antigen presentation markers, decreased regulatory T cell frequency and overall reduced checkpoint protein expression. Combination shIDO-ST treatment with anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 antibodies enhanced tumor growth control, compared to either treatment alone, which was associated with a significant intratumoral influx of CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes. These results suggest that the success of ICB therapy may be more accurately predicted by taking into account multiple factors such as potential for antigen presentation and frequency of suppressive immune subsets in addition to markers already being considered. Alternatively, combination treatment with agents such as shIDO-ST could be used to create a more conducive tumor microenvironment for improving response rates to immunotherapy.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.2%
2
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.2%
3
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
7
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
9
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
11
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
12
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
13
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
15
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
16
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
17
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
19
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
21
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
22
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
24
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
26
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
27
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
30
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%