Back

Use of immunoglobulin-binding bacterial proteins in immunodetection.

Vaillant, A. A. J.

2020-10-08 immunology
10.1101/2020.10.08.331462 bioRxiv
Show abstract

One of the aim of this study was to make universal chimeric conjugates to react with both avian and mammalian immunoglobulins in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). The periodate method was used in the conjugation process of cross-linking horseradish peroxidase to immunoglobulin-binding proteins (IBP) including staphylococcal protein A (SpA), streptococcal protein G (SpG) and peptostreptococcal protein L (SpL). By mixing up these three conjugates another four hybrid protein conjugates were created including protein LA (SpLA), protein LG (SpLG), protein AG (SpAG) and protein LAG (PLAG). Thirty-five ELISAs were standardized by a probabilistic combination of these immunoreagents. By using a panel of mainly mammalian immunoglobulins their reproducibility was checked by the determination of coefficient of variations (CV) for each one of the IgG-IBP binding. The source of immunoglobulins was their purification by affinity chromatography using a commercially available kit (PURE-1A). The other aim was to immunize chicken with the peptide fragment 254-274 of gp120 to produce anti-HIV peptide hyper-immune egg. Cats and rats were fed these eggs for a determined period until they produced the anti-HIV peptide antibody, which was tested by an indirect SpLA-ELISA and dot blot analysis that corroborated the production of anti-HIV antibodies by the mammalian species including positive humans samples for HIV. We conclude that the single and hybrid immunoglobulin-binding protein were effective in their binding capacity to immunoglobulins from a variety of mammalian species. The potential use of this proteins is in the arena of immunodiagnosis and immunoglobulin detection. Dot blot analysis proves effective in the detection of HIV anti-gp120 antibodies in several animal species. These antibodies can be used as reagents in the development of immunodiagnostic tests or experimental vaccines.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.3%
2
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
7
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
9
Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
10
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
11
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
12
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
13
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
14
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
15
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
18
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Journal of Dairy Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.5%
22
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%