Level of Knowledge in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Canadian Medical Students
Niburski, K.; Vaughan, R.; Papazova, E.; Todd, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundDuring health crises medical education is often derailed as was the case during the current COVID-19 pandemic. Medical trainees face the daunting task of having to gather, filter and synthesize new information about the evolving situation often without the standardized resources they are used to. MethodsWe surveyed Canadian medical students, in the hardest hit province of Quebec, on how they were acquiring knowledge as well as what they knew of the pandemic. Google Forms was used, with the survey being distributed to each medical school in Quebec (McGill, ULaval, Udem) both through email and through social media pages for each class year. Two analyses, Mann-Whitney and ANOVA tests, were performed for year of study and degree obtained. ResultsWe received responses from 111 medical students from three universities, which represents 5% of the students invited to complete the survey. Students reported using mass media most frequently (83%) and also had a high rate of use of social media (to gather information about the pandemic. They rated these resources low in terms of their trustworthiness despite the high rates of use (average 2.91 and 2.03 of 5 respectively). Medical students also endorsed using more formal resources like public health information, scientific journals and faculty-provided information that they trusted more, however, they accessed these resources at lower rates. Of note, medical students had correct answered 60% of COVID-19 prevention strategies, 73% clinical correct answers, 90% epidemiological correct answers. Additionally, students who were training in the larger city of Montreal, where the worst of the outbreak was focused, tended to significantly perform better (p<0.0001) than their colleagues who were not located there. ConclusionThese finding indicate a wide use of information resources intended for public consumption rather than more rigorous and trustworthy sources. Furthermore, there seems to be a knowledge gap amongst medical students responding to this survey that suggests an opportunity to improve the delivery of educational content during this rapidly evolving pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice related to the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate medical students in Indonesia: a nationwide cross-sectional study 95%
- Medical Students’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Motivation towards Antimicrobial Resistance Efforts in Eastern Uganda 94%
- Feasibility of an online antigen self-testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 addressed to health care and education professionals in Catalonia (Spain). The TESTA’T-COVID Project 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 94%
- Evaluation of Statistical Illiteracy in Latin American Clinicians and of the Efficacy of a 10-Hour Course 94%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 92%
- Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Engagement in Algeria: A Population-based Study with Systematic Review of Studies from Arab Countries of the MENA Region 92%
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: A national cross-sectional survey 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Monkeypox disease knowledge and perception among the healthcare workers versus the general population during the first month of the WHO emerging infectious disease alert 94%
- “Where the truth really lies”: Listening to voices from African American communities in the Southern States about COVID-19 vaccine information and communication 93%
- Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Socio-demographics, Co-Morbidity and Past Experience of Racial Discrimination 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.