EEG-based decoding and recognition of imagined music
Tibo, M.; Geirnaert, S.; Bertrand, A.
Show abstract
The authors have withdrawn their manuscript because they discovered an error in the analysis code after publication of the preprint, which turns out to have a major impact on the main results in the paper. The results on the imagination data become non-significant after correcting for the mistake. Significant results on the perception data are preserved, although the classification results are worse than what is reported. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as a reference. If you have any questions, please contact the last author.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid Brain Responses to Familiar vs. Unfamiliar Music - an EEG and Pupillometry study 94%
- Predicting the subjective intensity of imagined sensory experiences from electrophysiological measures of oscillatory brain activity. 93%
- Decoding real world visual scenes from the human gamma band with flicker evoked oscillations. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- 'Are you even listening?' - EEG-based decoding of absolute auditory attention to natural speech 95%
- Speech decoding from a small set of spatially segregated minimally invasive intracranial EEG electrodes with a compact and interpretable neural network 94%
- Robust assessment of the cortical encoding of word-level expectations using the temporal response function 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Speech-driven Facial Animations Improve Speech-in-Noise Comprehension of Humans 93%
- Decoding continuous variables from event-related potential (ERP) data with linear support vector regression (SVR) using the Decision Decoding Toolbox (DDTBOX) 92%
- A sparse EEG-informed fMRI model for hybrid EEG-fMRI neurofeedback prediction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.