Back

A Multi-center Study of COVID-19 with Multivariate Prognostic Analysis

Zeng, W.; Feng, X.; Huang, J.; Du, C.; Qu, D.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, j.

2020-09-28 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2020.09.26.20202234 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is now a global health concern. However, there is no detailed analysis of the factors related to patients improvement. Patients and methodsWe compared the clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, CT images, and treatment of COVID-19 patients from two different cities in China. One hundred and sixty-nine patients were recruited from January 27 to March 17, 2020 at five hospitals in Hubei and Guangxi. They were divided into four groups according to age and into two groups according to presence of comorbidities. Multivariate statistical analyses were performed for the prognosis of the disease. ResultsFifty-two patients (30.8%) had comorbidities, and the percentage of critical COVID-19was higher in the comorbidities group (11.6%vs.0.9%, p<0.05). Older patients had higher proportion of severe or critical disease. The results showed that lymphocyte count was significantly associated with the number of days from positive COVID-19 nucleic acid test to negative test; number of days from onset of symptoms to confirmation of diagnosis was significantly associated with the time it took for symptoms to improve; and number of days from onset of symptoms to confirmation of diagnosis and disease severity were significantly associated with chest computed tomography improvement. ConclusionsAge, comorbidities, lymphocyte count, and SpO2 may predict the risk of severity of COVID-19. Early isolation, early diagnosis, and early initiation of management can slow down the progression and spread of COVID-19. Key PointsAge and comorbidities can predict the risk of severity of COVID-19, Lymphocyte count and SpO2 may predict the risk of severity of COVID-19. Early isolation, Early diagnosis can slow down the progression of COVID-19

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
5
Virology Journal
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
8
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
9
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
10
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
12
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
13
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
14
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
15
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
24
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
29
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%