Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the Cognitive Social Capital Scale in a Colombian sample
Campo-Arias, A.; Caballero-Dominguez, C. C.
Show abstract
During the last two decades, the concept of social capital has been used with increasing frequency in health sciences due to the direct and indirect relationships between social capital and populations physical and mental health. Therefore, it is necessary to build an instrument to quantify this concept confidently and reliably. The study aimed to perform exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses on a seven-item scale to measure social capital in adults of Colombias general population. An online validation study was done, including a sample of 700 adults aged between 18 and 76 years; 68% were females. Participants completed a seven-item scale called the Cognitive Social Capital Scale (CSCS). Cronbachs alpha and McDonalds omega were computed to test internal consistency. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to explore the dimensionality of the CSCS. The CSCS presented a low internal consistency (Cronbachs alpha of 0.56 and McDonalds omega of 0.59) and poor dimensionality. Then, a five-item version (CSCS-5) was tested. The CSCS-5 showed high internal consistency (Cronbachs alpha of 0.79 and McDonalds omega of 0.80) and a one-dimension structure with acceptable goodness-of-fit indicators. In conclusion, the CSCS-5 presents high internal consistency and a one-dimension structure to measure cognitive capital social in Colombian sample. It can be recommended for the measuring of social capital in the general Colombian population. Further research should corroborate these findings on pencil and paper applications and explore other reliability and validity indicators.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Family Vulnerability Scale: evidence of content and internal structure validity 97%
- Developing and validation of a questionnaire for assessment of individual's perceived risk of four major non-communicable diseases in Myanmar 96%
- Misinformation on covid-19 origin and its relationship with perception and knowledge about social distancing: A cross-sectional study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 96%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 93%
- Have the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown Affected Children’s Mental Health in the Long Term? A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 94%
- Health literacy profiles correlate with participation in primary health care among patients with chronic diseases: A latent profile analysis 93%
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: A national cross-sectional survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 95%
- Acculturation stressors and academic adjustment among Nepalese students in South Korean higher education institutions 95%
- Using A Socio-Ecological System (SES) Framework to Explain Factors Influencing Countries’ Success Level in Curbing COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality of life and depressive symptoms among Peruvian university students during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- A cross-sectional survey of material deprivation and suicide-related ideation among Vietnamese technical interns in Japan in 2021 94%
- COVID-19 knowledge, risk perception and precautionary behaviour among Nigerians: A moderated mediation approach 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.