An analysis of clinical and geographical metadata of over 75,000 records in the GISAID COVID-19 database
Velazquez, A.; Bustria, M.; Ouyang, Y.; Moshiri, N.
Show abstract
During the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak that caused the coronavirus pandemic it is important now more than ever that scientists and public health officials work side-by-side and use their available resources to track patient information from those that have been affected by the novel coronavirus. The ability to track the disease helps identify possible trends and patterns that can be used by public health officials to make more informed decisions. Tracking data like this may be the key to helping states and countries safely re-open. However, when analyzing large collections of data there is the occurrence of confounding factors such as biases in patient sampling. In this project, a massive collection of COVID-19 data was analyzed, and explored potential biases in patient sampling were explored.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A structured course of disease dataset with contact tracing information in Taiwan for COVID-19 modelling 93%
- Anatomical structures, cell types, and biomarkers of the healthy human blood vasculature 91%
- CovidCounties - an interactive, real-time tracker of the COVID-19 pandemic at the level of US counties 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extract, Transform, Load Framework for the Conversion of Health Databases to OMOP 93%
- Understanding signaling and metabolic paths using semantified and harmonized information about biological interactions 91%
- A novel computational approach to reconstruct SARS-CoV-2 infection dynamics through the inference of unsampled sources of infection 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative monitoring of nucleotide sequence data from genetic resources in context of their citation in the scientific literature 92%
- Health Data Nexus: An Open Data Platform for AI Research and Education in Medicine 92%
- New implementation of data standards for AI research in precision oncology. Experience from EuCanImage 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.