Role of treatments for diabetes and hyperlipidaemia in risk and mortality of primary and secondary brain tumours
Robinson, J. W.; Martin, R.; Ozawa, M.; Elwenspoek, M. M. C.; Redaniel, M. T.; Kurian, K.; Ben-Shlomo, Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn vivo and observational studies suggest anti-hyperlipidaemic and -diabetic medications (fibrates and glitazones respectively) may have a role in primary prevention and progression of brain tumours by targeting PPAR- and -{gamma}, respectively. MethodsWe conducted a case-control and clinical cohort study within the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. We identified adults (aged 18 years+) with primary or secondary brain tumours diagnosed between 2000-2016 prescribed either fibrates or glitazones and identified four controls based on age, sex and drug exposure duration. Multivariable logistic regression analysis estimated an association between drug exposure and brain tumour status. Coxs survival models were used to look at risk of mortality. Results1,916 cases were prescribed a fibrate and 445 cases a glitazone. Our analyses showed little evidence of an association between fibrates and either risk or mortality of brain tumours (adjusted odds ratio for ever exposed PPAR- 0.98, 95% CI: 0.77, 1.23; adjusted hazard ratio for ever exposed 0.91; 95% CI: 0.76, 1.09). We observed a reduced risk with a per-year increase in exposure duration for glitazones (adjusted odds ratio 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81, 0.96, P=0.002) but no major mortality benefit (adjusted hazard ratio 0.99, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.23). ConclusionsOur results suggest longer duration exposure to glitazones is associated with a reduced risk of primary and secondary brain tumours but no large effect on mortality. We failed to find any strong evidence of a protective effect on risk or mortality for fibrate exposure. Further studies are required for replication and to provide more precise effect estimates. Key PointsO_LIRepurposing existing drugs that target PPAR- and -{gamma} receptors may have a role in prevention and progression of brain tumours. C_LIO_LIWe observed a reduced risk between duration of glitazones and both primary and secondary brain tumours but no major reduction on mortality C_LIO_LIWe observed no major reduction of risk or mortality with fibrates C_LIO_LIFuture studies need to be undertaken to ensure replication and obtain more precise estimates C_LI Importance of StudyThe incidence of brain tumours appears to be increasing with a growing impact on years of life lost. Therapeutic options are limited, either for primary prevention or to prevent mortality of disease once developed. We investigated whether two commonly prescribed families of drugs (fibrates and glitazones) could offer potential drug-repurposing options in reducing brain tumour incidence or progression as informed by previous in vivo and observational studies. Our analyses suggest that glitazones are associated with a decreased brain tumour risk. These results can help guide future research into drug re-repurposing for brain tumour treatment.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Statin treatment effectiveness and the SLCO1B1 *5 reduced function genotype: long-term outcomes in women and men 91%
- Antihypertensive Medications and COVID-19 Diagnosis and Mortality: Population-based Case-Control Analysis in the United Kingdom 91%
- A comprehensive assessment of statin discontinuation among patients who concurrently initiate statins and CYP3A4-inhibitor drugs; a multistate transition model 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Are Statins Optimally Prescribed to Reduce Stroke Risk in Patients with Hypercholesterolaemia? A population-based Longitudinal Study Using Electronic Health Records in South London (2005-2021) 92%
- Cardiovascular events and venous thromboembolism after primary malignant and non-malignant brain tumour diagnosis: a population matched cohort study in Wales (United Kingdom) 90%
- The Incidence of Immune Mediated Inflammatory Diseases Following COVID-19: a Matched Cohort Study in UK Primary Care 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emulating randomized controlled trials of long-acting insulins and cardiovascular events using real-world data for patients with type 2 diabetes 90%
- Longitudinal effects of using and discontinuing CNS medications on cognitive functioning 89%
- Safety of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine batches: A nationwide cohort study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Repurposing antihypertensive drugs for the prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: a Mendelian Randomization study 88%
- Ethnic minority groups in England and Wales - factors affecting the size and timing of elevated COVID-19 mortality: a retrospective cohort study linking Census and death records 88%
- Association of pre-existing maternal cardiovascular diseases with neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring: a cohort study in Sweden and British Columbia, Canada 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid Epidemiological Analysis of Comorbidities and Treatments as risk factors for COVID-19 in Scotland (REACT-SCOT): a population-based case-control study 90%
- Adverse Outcomes and Mortality in Users of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs tested positive for SARS-CoV-2: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study 89%
- Factors associated with excess all-cause mortality in the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a time-series analysis using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.