Back

STAMPede: A Precision Oncology Catalogue of Solid Tumors

Chen, J. W.; Kalantarian, H.; Kunder, C. A.; Zehnder, J. L.; Stehr, H.; Costa, H. A.

2020-09-20 genomics
10.1101/2020.09.18.290635 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Molecular profiling of tumor specimens is a key contributor in the application of precision medicine toward patient care in oncology. The presence of genetic mutational data may provide insight into the etiology of the cancer and inform about the available therapeutic options for patients diagnosed with various cancer types. However, the ability to centrally organize, structure, and visualize this genetic data can be hindered by the lack of necessary computational infrastructure. Here we present a somatic tumor data visualization portal titled STAMPede that utilizes tumor sequencing data from an in-house solid tumor oncology sequencing panel at Stanford Health Care. STAMPede is intended to provide Stanford healthcare providers and clinical researchers an easy to navigate web-based portal to query and display gene-, variant-, and cancer-level summary statistics.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
BMC Medical Genomics
○ 50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Scientific Data
○ 209 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.0%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
Similar papers in this journal
5
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.2%
Similar papers in this journal
6
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.9%
7
Database
◐ 61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
8
Human Mutation
○ 34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
● 22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
11
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
12
Genetics in Medicine
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
13
BMC Cancer
○ 67 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
17
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Gigabyte
● 62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
19
European Radiology
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Genome Medicine
○ 183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
23
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
24
BMC Research Notes
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Genetic Epidemiology
○ 55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.9%
28
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
◐ 351 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
JCO Precision Oncology
● 14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.