The impact of vital signs on the death of patients with new coronavirus pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Du, M.; Zhao, J.; Yin, X.; Zhang, N.; Zheng, G.
Show abstract
Background: Assessing the impact of vital signs (blood pressure, body temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation) on the death of patients with new coronavirus pneumonia would provide a simple and convenient method for the monitoring of subsequent illness, and therefore, in some degree reduce treatment costs and increase the cure rate clinically. Methods: Six databases were retrieved. The software R 3.6.2 was used for meta-analysis of the included literature. Results: 12 studies were included, which comprise 8996 patients affected with COVID-19 infection. The meta-analysis study found that blood pressure (MAP, SBP and DBP), heart rate, respiration rate and SpO2 are the risk factors for disease progression in patients with COVID-19. Among them, the increase in MAP and the decrease in SpO2 have the greatest impact on the death of patients with COVID-19 [MAP: MD = 5.66, 95% CI (0.34, 10.98), SpO2: MD = -5.87, 95% CI (-9.17, -2.57), P = 0.0005]. However, comparing the body temperature of the death group and the survival group found that the body temperature was not statistically significant between the two groups [body temperature: MD = 0.21, 95% CI (-0.01, 0.43), P = 0.0661]. Conclusion: The increase in MAP, heart rate and respiratory rate, as well as the decrease in SBP, DBP and SpO2 are all independent risk factors for death in patients with COVID-19. These factors are simple and easy to monitor, and individualized treatment can be given to patients in time, reducing the mortality rate and improving treatment efficiency.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Survival analysis of hospital length of stay of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia patients in Sichuan, China 97%
- Clinical Laboratory Parameters Associated with Severe or Critical Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 96%
- Factors Associated with Disease Severity and Mortality among Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the disease outcome in Covid-19 infected patients by disease symptoms: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Ilam Province, Iran 94%
- Determinants of Developing Symptomatic Disease in Ethiopian COVID-19 Patients 94%
- Correlation Analysis Between Disease Severity and Inflammation-related Parameters in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Chest CT Features of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Meta-analysis of 19 Trials 93%
- Prediction and Evolution of B Cell Epitopes of Surface Protein in SARS-CoV-2 92%
- Multicenter performance evaluation of a novel rapid molecular point-of-care test to detect influenza using nasopharyngeal swabs and gargle samples 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of remdesivir-containing therapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a prospective clinical experience 94%
- Evaluation of triage checklist for mild COVID-19 outpatients in predicting subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalization during isolation period 93%
- Screening for Right Ventricular Dysfunction in the Emergency Department Using a Smartphone ECG Analysis Application: An External Validation Study with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of clarithromycin on COVID-19 pneumonia without oxygen administration; protocol for multicenter, open-label, randomized-controlled, 3-armed parallel group comparison, exploratory trial (CAME COVID study) 93%
- Risk factors for severity on admission and the disease progression during hospitalization in a large cohort of COVID-19 patients in Japan 93%
- Favipiravir for treating novel coronavirus (COVID-19) patients: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.