Back

Vent-Lock: A 3D Printed Ventilator Multiplexer to Enhance the Capacity of Treating Patients with COVID-19

Xun, H.; Shallal, C.; Unger, J.; Tao, R.; Torres, A.; Vladimirov, M.; Frye, J.; Singhala, M.; Horne, B.; Yesantharao, P.; Kim, B. S.; Burke, B.; Montana, M.; Talcott, M.; Winters, B.; Frisella, M.; Kushner, B.; Sacks, J.; Guest, J.; Kang, S. H.; Caffrey, J.

2020-09-22 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2020.09.16.20195230
Show abstract

Mechanical ventilators are essential to patients who become critically ill from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and shortages have been reported due to the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We utilized cost-effective, on-demand 3D printing (3DP) technology to produce critical components for a novel ventilator multiplexer system, Vent-Lock, to split one ventilator or anesthesia gas machine between two patients. FloRest, a novel 3DP flow restrictor, provides clinicians control of tidal volumes and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), using the 3DP manometer adaptor to monitor pressures. We tested the ventilator splitter circuit in simulation centers between artificial lungs and used an anesthesia gas machine to successfully ventilate two swines. As one of the first studies to demonstrate splitting one anesthesia gas machine between two swines, we present proof-of-concept of a de novo, closed, multiplexing system, with flow restriction for individualized patient therapy. Our studies underscore that while possible, ventilator multiplexing is a complicated synergy between machine settings, circuit modification, and patient monitoring. Consequently, ventilator multiplexing is reserved only as a last emergency resource, by trained clinicians and respiratory therapists with ventilator operative experience.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 19%
18.9%
2
Applied Sciences
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
17.1%
3
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 5%
14.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Critical Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
5.0%
5
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 3%
5.0%
6
Royal Society Open Science
based on 49 papers
Top 2%
2.7%
7
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 8%
2.0%
8
Critical Care Explorations
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
1.5%
10
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 6%
1.5%
11
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.5%
12
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 42%
1.5%
13
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 13%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Neuroscience
based on 29 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
15
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
16
Advanced Science
based on 12 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Clinical Chemistry
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
based on 10 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
19
F1000Research
based on 28 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
20
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
based on 23 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 42%
0.7%
22
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 17%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
based on 10 papers
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
25
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 5%
0.7%