Back

The impact of vaccination on Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial resistance and prevalence in men who have sex with men: a mathematical modelling study

Heijne, J. C.; Xiridou, M.; Turner, K.; Basten, M.; Visser, M.; van Benthem, B.; Low, N.

2020-09-15 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.09.14.20192062 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Neisseria gonorrhoeae (gonorrhoea) and antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) gonorrhoea infections disproportionately affect men who have sex with men (MSM). Vaccine development is challenging, but a N. meningitidis (group B) vaccine given to children and young adults was associated with a ca. 30% reduction in gonorrhoea diagnoses. We investigated the impact of vaccination on N. gonorrhoeae AMR development and transmission in MSM. Methods. We developed a compartmental model of N. gonorrhoeae transmission among MSM. AMR to ceftriaxone was incorporated as a stepwise increases in minimum inhibitory concentrations and eventual resistance (MIC drift). We estimated the impact of a partially protective vaccine (reducing susceptibility; 2-years protection) targeting high sexual activity MSM on AMR and prevalence until 2050. We performed sensitivity analyses assuming different levels of vaccine effectiveness (VE) and other modes of vaccine action. Findings. Gonorrhoea model prevalence was 3.4% (95% credible interval 3.2% - 3.8%) in all MSM, 12.5% (95% credible interval 12.1% - 12.7%) in high sexual activity MSM. A vaccine with 30% VE cannot prevent AMR, even with high uptake or durable protection. However, it increases time to AMR development by several years. For a fixed uptake of 40% a vaccine needs a minimum VE of 90% to prevent AMR development completely. A vaccine providing complete protection to infection for those vaccinated was most effective in reducing population prevalence and preventing AMR. Interpretation. A vaccine that has limited efficacy for the prevention of gonorrhoea could delay AMR development in MSM, providing time for developing new antimicrobials and more efficacious vaccines.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.3%
2
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
6
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
7
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
8
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
10
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
14
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
15
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
21
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
24
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%