Back

Computed Tomography Features of COVID-19 in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Wang, J.-G.; Mo, Y.-F.; Su, Y.-h.; Wang, L.-c.; Liu, G.-b.; Li, M.; Qin, Q.-q.

2020-09-03 pediatrics
10.1101/2020.09.02.20187187
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo systematically analyze the chest CT imaging features of children with COVID-19 and provide references for clinical practice. MethodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase; data published by Johns Hopkins University; and Chinese databases CNKI, Wanfang, and Chongqing Weipu. Reports on chest CT imaging features of children with COVID-19 from January 1, 2020, to August 10, 2020, were analyzed retrospectively and a meta-analysis carried out using Stata12.0 software. ResultsThirty-seven articles (1747 children) were included in this study. The overall rate of abnormal lung CT findings was 63.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.8-70.6%), with a rate of 61.0% (95% CI: 50.8-71.2%) in China and 67.8% (95% CI: 57.1-78.4%) in the rest of the world in the subgroup analysis. The incidence of ground-glass opacities was 39.5% (95% CI: 30.7-48.3%), multiple lung lobe lesions 65.1% (95% CI: 55.1-67.9%), and bilateral lung lesions 61.5% (95% CI: 58.8-72.2%). Other imaging features included nodules (25.7%), patchy shadows (36.8%), halo sign(24.8%), consolidation (24.1%), air bronchogram signs (11.2%), cord-like shadows (9.7%), crazy-paving pattern (6.1%), and pleural effusion (9.1%). Two articles reported three cases of white lung, another reported two cases of pneumothorax, and another one case of bullae. CONCLUSIONThe lung CT results of children with COVID-19 are usually normal or slightly atypica, with a low sensitivity and specificity compared with that in adults. The lung lesions of COVID-19 pediatric patients mostly involve both lungs or multiple lobes, and the common manifestations are patchy shadows, ground-glass opacities, consolidation, partial air bronchogram signs, nodules, and halo signs; white lung, pleural effusion, and paving stone signs are rare. CLINICAL IMPACTTherefore, chest CT has limited value as a screening tool for children with COVID-19 and can only be used as an auxiliary assessment tool. RegistrationThis systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the Prospero International Prospective Register of Systemic Reviews (CRD42020196602). Strengths and limitations of this studyThe lung CT findings of children with COVID-19 are usually normal or slightly atypical, with a low sensitivity and specificity compared with that in adults. From a systematic review of current literature, the overall rate of abnormal lung CT findings in children was revealed to be 63.2%. Chest CT has limited value as a screening tool for children with COVID-19 and can only be used as an auxiliary assessment tool. The sample size of some included studies is small, which may affect the results.

Matching journals

1
Annals of Translational Medicine
AME Publishing Company · based on 14 published papers
#1
121× avg
2
Pediatric Pulmonology
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
#1
166× avg
3
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 16 published papers
Top 0.2%
82× avg
4
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers Media SA · based on 24 published papers
Top 0.4%
51× avg
5
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ · based on 20 published papers
Top 0.7%
40× avg
6
Pediatrics
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) · based on 10 published papers
Top 0.1%
99× avg
7
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 23%
4.7%
8
Pediatric Research
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.5%
58× avg
9
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 74%
4.0%
10
Archives of Disease in Childhood
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.6%
35× avg
11
The Journal of Pediatrics
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.7%
31× avg
12
European Respiratory Journal
European Respiratory Society (ERS) · based on 44 published papers
Top 3%
6.0× avg
13
ERJ Open Research
European Respiratory Society (ERS) · based on 36 published papers
Top 2%
8.9× avg
14
Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 4%
5.2× avg
15
JAMA Network Open
American Medical Association (AMA) · based on 125 published papers
Top 12%
1.9× avg
16
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 79%
1.3%
17
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 16%
0.8%
18
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 14%
1.6× avg
19
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
Frontiers Media SA · based on 10 published papers
Top 0.9%
15× avg
20
Vaccines
MDPI AG · based on 131 published papers
Top 7%
2.2× avg
21
JAMA Pediatrics
American Medical Association (AMA) · based on 10 published papers
Top 1%
14× avg
22
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · based on 50 published papers
Top 11%
1.9× avg