Back

Reporting to the Convention on Biology Diversity: How are countries assessing and protecting their genetic diversity?

Hoban, S.; Campbell, C.; da Silva, J.; Ekblom, R.; Funk, W. C.; Garner, B.; Godoy, J. A.; Kershaw, F.; MacDonald, A.; Mergeay, J.; Minter, M.; O'Brien, D.; Paz-Vinas, I.; Pearson, S. K.; Perez-Espona, S.; Potter, K.; Russo, I.-R.; Segelbacher, G.; Vernesi, C.; Hunter, M.

2020-08-31 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2020.08.28.254672 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genetic diversity is critically important for all species-domesticated and wild- to adapt to environmental change, and for ecosystem resilience to extreme events. International agreements such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) have committed to conserve and sustainably and equitably use all levels of biodiversity-genes, species and ecosystems-globally. However, assessment and monitoring of genetic diversity are often overlooked, and there are large knowledge and policy gaps regarding genetic diversity conservation. In this study, we present the first quantitative analysis of genetic diversity assessments conducted by Parties to the CBD. We conducted a detailed, systematic analysis of 114 CBD 5th (submitted 2014) and 6th (submitted 2018) National Reports to quantitatively assess actions, progress on targets, values and indicators related to genetic diversity. First, we found that the importance of genetic diversity is recognised by most Parties to the CBD, and that recognition increased over time. However, genetic targets mainly addressed genetic diversity within cultivated plants, farm animals, and crop wild relatives, with little focus on other wild species. Also, actions for conserving genetic diversity primarily concerned ex-situ facilities and policy, rather than monitoring and intervention for maintaining genetic diversity in situ. The most commonly used indicators of genetic diversity status were the number of genetic resources in conservation facilities, number of threatened breeds, and Red List Index, which are not well correlated to genetic erosion in most species -- highlighting that genetic change is poorly monitored by current indicators. Lastly, analyses of genetic data observations, indigenous use and knowledge of genetic diversity, and strategies being developed and implemented to conserve genetic diversity are highly under-reported. We make several recommendations for the post-2020 CBD Biodiversity Framework to improve awareness, assessment, and monitoring, and facilitate consistent and complete reporting of progress of genetic diversity in future National Reports. Article Impact StatementAn analysis of genetic diversity in CBD National Reports neglects non-domesticated species and demonstrates need for sufficient indicators.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.3%
2
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
3
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
6
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
13
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
17
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%