Back

Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody in hospitalized patients in a tertiary referral center in North India

Ray, A.; Singh, K.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Mehdi, F.; Batra, G.; Gupta, A.; Agarwal, A.; M, B.; Sahni, S.; R, C.; Agarwal, S.; Nagpal, C.; B H, G.; Arora, U.; Sharma, K. K.; Singh Jadon, R.; Datt Upadhyay, A.; Nischal, N.; Vikram, N. K.; Soneja, M.; Pandey, R. M.; Wig, N.

2020-08-25 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.08.22.20179937
Show abstract

BackgroundSeroprevalence of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is an important tool to estimate the true extent of infection in a population. However, seroprevalence studies have been scarce in South East Asia including India, which, as of now, carries the third largest burden of confirmed cases in the world. The present study aimed to estimate the seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody among hospitalized patients at one of the largest government hospital in India. MethodThis cross-sectional study, conducted at a tertiary care hospital in North India, recruited consecutive patients who were negative for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR or CB-NAAT. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels targeting recombinant spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) protein of SARS CoV-2 were estimated in serum sample by the ELISA method. ResultsA total of 212 hospitalized patients were recruited in the study with mean age ({+/-}SD) of 41.2 ({+/-}15.4) years and 55% male population. Positive serology against SARS CoV-2 was detected in 19.8% patients(95% CI 14.7-25.8). Residency in Delhi conferred a higher frequency of seropositivity 26.5% (95% CI 19.3-34.7) as compared to that of other states 8% (95% CI 3.0-16.4) with p value 0.001. No particular age groups or socio-economic strata showed a higher proportion of seropositivity. ConclusionAround, one-fifth of hospitalized patients, who were not diagnosed with COVID-19 before, demonstrated seropositivity against SARS-CoV-2. While there was no significant difference in the different age groups and socio-economic classes; residence in Delhi was associated with increased risk (relative risk of 3.62, 95% CI 1.59-8.21)

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 28%
16.1%
2
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 0.5%
13.1%
3
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 0.3%
7.9%
4
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 2%
4.7%
5
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
based on 10 papers
Top 0.2%
3.1%
6
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 29%
2.9%
7
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 59%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 8%
2.4%
9
IJID Regions
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Journal of Infection and Public Health
based on 15 papers
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 5%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 16%
1.6%
13
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 6%
1.4%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 11%
1.4%
15
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 7%
1.4%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 17%
1.4%
17
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 8%
1.3%
18
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 50 papers
Top 8%
1.3%
19
EClinicalMedicine
based on 21 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Vaccines
based on 131 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Journal of Clinical Virology
based on 54 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 21%
0.7%
24
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 11%
0.7%
26
Journal of Public Health
based on 23 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Journal of Virological Methods
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
0.7%