Back

Association of Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act with Insurance Status and Clinical Characteristics of Low-Income Patients with Newly Diagnosed Melanoma

Puri, P.; Pittelkow, M. R.; Mi, L.; Mangold, A. R.

2020-08-25 dermatology
10.1101/2020.08.22.20179903 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceThe Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid eligibility in participating states to individuals with incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty line. The effects of this policy on the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma in low-income populations has yet to be described. ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of Medicaid expansion on changes in insurance status and clinical characteristics of low-income patients with newly diagnosed melanoma. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study included patients younger than 65 with a new diagnosis of malignant melanoma from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2016, in the US National Cancer Institutes Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. ExposuresResidence in a state that expanded Medicaid on January 1, 2014. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were insurance status, melanoma staging, and overall survival. ResultsIn Medicaid expansion states, there were 1,719 low-income patients with newly diagnosed melanoma during the pre-expansion time period and 1,984 (15% increase) during the post-expansion time period. In nonexpansion states, there were 326 low-income patients with newly diagnosed melanoma during the pre-expansion time period, and 288 during the post-expansion time period (12% decrease). Compared with nonexpansion states, expansion states had a significantly greater reduction in percentage of uninsured patients following Medicaid expansion (adjusted odds ratio, 6.27 [95% CI, 4.83 to 8.14]). Overall survival was not statistically different between expansion and nonexpansion states (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.74 to 1.06]). There were no statistically significant differences in melanoma staging at diagnosis between the expansion and nonexpansion groups (p = 0.05). Conclusions and RelevanceMedicaid expansion was associated with increased melanoma diagnoses in low-income patients and a decreased proportion of uninsured patients. However, our study did not identify differences in clinical outcomes associated with Medicaid expansion. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWas Medicaid expansion associated with changes in insurance status and clinical characteristics of low-income melanoma patients? FindingsMedicaid expansion was associated with increased diagnoses of melanoma in low-income populations and reductions in the proportion of uninsured melanoma patients. However, there were no statistically significant changes in staging at diagnosis or overall survival associated with Medicaid expansion. MeaningIncreased health insurance coverage associated with Medicaid expansion could potentially improve timely detection and treatment of melanoma for low-income populations.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.2%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.0%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.2%
8
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.2%
9
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
14
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
17
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%