Back

Specialized terminology limits the reach of new scientific knowledge

Martinez, A.; Mammola, S.

2020-08-21 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2020.08.20.258996 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Words are the building blocks of science. As our understanding of the world progresses, scientific disciplines naturally enrich their specialized vocabulary (jargon). However, in the era of interdisciplinarity, the use of jargon may hinder effective communication amongst scientists that do not share a common linguistic background. The question of how jargon limits the transmission of scientific knowledge has long been debated, but rarely addressed quantitatively. We explored the relationship between the use of jargon and citations using 21,486 articles focusing on cave research, a multidisciplinary field particularly prone to terminological specialization and where linguistic disagreement among peers is frequent. We demonstrate that the use of jargon in the title and abstract significantly reduces the number of citations a paper receives. Given that these elements are the hook to readers, we urge scientists to restrict jargon to sections of the paper where its use is unavoidable.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
FEBS Letters
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
13
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
14
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Research Synthesis Methods
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%