Integrated packages of non-pharmaceutical interventions increased public health response efficiency against COVID-19 during the first European wave: evidence from 32 European countries
Garchitorena, A.; Gruson, H.; Cazelles, B.; Karki, T.; Sudre, B.; ROCHE, B.
Show abstract
Since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, governments around the World have implemented a combination of public health responses based on non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), with significant social and economic consequences. Though most European countries have overcome the first epidemic wave, it remains of high priority to quantify the efficiency of different NPIs to inform preparedness for an impending second wave. In this study, combining capture-recapture methods with Bayesian inference in an age-structured mathematical model, we use a unique European dataset compiled by the European Centre for Disease Control (ECDC) to quantify the efficiency of 24 NPIs and their combinations (referred to as public health responses, PHR) in reducing SARS-Cov-2 transmission rates in 32 European countries. Of 166 unique PHR tested, we found that median decrease in viral transmission was 74%, which is enough to suppress the epidemic. PHR efficiency was positively associated with the number of NPIs implemented. We found that bans on mass gatherings had the largest effect among NPIs, followed by school closures, teleworking, and stay home orders. Partial implementation of most NPIs resulted in lower than average response efficiency. This first large-scale estimation of NPI and PHR efficiency against SARS-COV-2 transmission in Europe suggests that a combination of NPIs targeting different population groups should be favored to control future epidemic waves.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Looking under the lamp-post: quantifying the performance of contact tracing in the United States during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic 95%
- Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and deaths: cross-national natural experiment in 32 European countries 95%
- The relative effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on early Covid-19 mortality: natural experiment in 130 countries 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A causal inference approach for estimating effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions during Covid-19 pandemic 96%
- Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on the number of new infections with COVID-19 during the first epidemic wave 95%
- Which COVID policies are most effective? A Bayesian analysis of COVID-19 by jurisdiction 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 δ variant in French regions in June 2021 94%
- Attribution of invasive group A streptococcal infections to varicella and respiratory virus circulation, the Netherlands, 2010-2023 93%
- Contact behaviour before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: evidence from contact surveys in 2016-2017 and 2020-2023 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Belgium by means of an extended SEIQRD model and public mobility data 95%
- The COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Switzerland and its impact on disease spread 95%
- Assessing the nationwide impact of COVID-19 mitigation policies on the transmission rate of SARS-CoV-2 in Brazil 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the COVID-19 responses of Belgium, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom, February-June 2020: A counterfactual modelling study 95%
- SARS-CoV-2 infection risk during delivery of childhood vaccination campaigns: a modelling study 94%
- Quantifying the dynamics of COVID-19 burden and impact of interventions in Java, Indonesia 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.