Back

Investigation of pooling strategies using clinical COVID-19 samples for more efficient diagnostic testing

Adikari, S. H.; Alipio Lyon, E. Z.; Hollander, A. D.; Deshpande, A.; Hong-Geller, E.

2020-08-14 public and global health
10.1101/2020.08.10.20171819 medRxiv
Show abstract

When testing large numbers of clinical COVID-19 samples for diagnostic purposes, pooling samples together for processing can offer significant reductions in the materials, reagents, time, and labor needed. We have evaluated two different strategies for pooling independent nasopharyngeal swab samples prior to testing with an EUA-approved SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR diagnostic assay. First, in the Dilution Study, we assessed the assay's ability to detect a single positive clinical sample diluted in multiple negative samples before the viral RNA extraction stage. We observed that positive samples with Ct values at ~30 can be reliably detected in pools of up to 30 independent samples, and positive samples with Ct values at ~35 can be detected in pools of 5 samples. Second, in the Reloading Study, we assessed the efficacy of reloading QIAamp viral RNA extraction columns numerous times using a single positive sample and multiple negative samples. We determined that one RNA extraction column can be reloaded with up to 20 clinical samples (1 positive and 19 negatives) sequentially without any loss of signal in the diagnostic assay. Furthermore, we found there was no significant difference in assay readout whether the positive sample was loaded first or last in a series of 20 samples. These results demonstrate that different pooling strategies can lead to increased process efficiencies for COVID-19 clinical diagnostic testing.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
22.9%
2
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
4
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
7
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
9
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
14
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
20
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.7%
22
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
24
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%