Back

Beneficial effects of colchicine for moderate to severe COVID-19: an interim analysis of a randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled clinical trial

Lopes, M. I. F.; Bonjorno, L. P.; Giannini, M. C.; Amaral, N. B.; Benatti, M. N.; Rezek, U. C.; Emrich-Filho, L. L.; Sousa, B. A.; Almeida, S. C.; Luppino-Assad, R.; Veras, F. P.; Schneider, A.; Rodrigues, T. S.; Leiria, L. O.; Cunha, L. D.; Alves-Filho, J. C.; Cunha, T. M.; Neto, E. A.; Miranda, C. H.; Pazin-Filho, A.; Martins, M. A.; Borges, M. C.; Fonseca, B. A.; Bollela, V. R.; Cunha, F. Q.; Zamboni, D. S.; Santana, R. C.; Vilar, F. C.; Louzada-Junior, P.; Oliveira, R. D. R.

2020-08-11 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.08.06.20169573
Show abstract

IntroductionNeutrophilia and high levels of proinflammatory cytokines and other mediators of inflammation are common finds in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome due to COVID-19. By its action on leukocytes, we propose colchicine as an intervention worthy of being tested. ObjectiveTo evaluate whether the addition of colchicine to standard treatment for COVID-19 results in better outcomes. MethodsWe present the interim analysis of a single-center randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled clinical trial of colchicine for the treatment of moderate to severe COVID-19, with 38 patients allocated 1:1 from April 11 to July 06, 2020. Colchicine regimen was 0.5 mg thrice daily for 5 days, then 0.5 mg twice daily for 5 days. The first dose was 1.0 mg whether body weight was [&ge;] 80 kg. EndpointsThe primary endpoints were the need for supplemental oxygen; time of hospitalization; need for admission and length of stay in intensive care units; and death rate and causes of mortality. As secondary endpoints, we assessed: serum C-reactive protein, serum Lactate dehydrogenase and relation neutrophil to lymphocyte of peripheral blood samples from day zero to day 7; the number, type, and severity of adverse events; frequency of interruption of the study protocol due to adverse events; and frequency of QT interval above 450 ms. ResultsThirty-five patients (18 for Placebo and 17 for Colchicine) completed the study. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic, clinical and laboratory data at baseline. Median (and interquartile range) time of need for supplemental oxygen was 3.0 (1.5-6.5) days for the Colchicine group and 7.0 (3.0-8.5) days for Placebo group (p = 0.02). Median (IQR) time of hospitalization was 6.0 (4.0-8.5) days for the Colchicine group and 8.5 (5.5-11.0) days for Placebo group (p = 0.03). At day 2, 53% vs 83% of patients maintained the need for supplemental oxygen, while at day 7 the values were 6% vs 39%, in the Colchicine and Placebo groups, respectively (log rank; p = 0.01). Hospitalization was maintained for 53% vs 78% of patients at day 5 and 6% vs 17% at day 10, for the Colchicine and Placebo groups, respectively (log rank; p = 0.01). One patient per group needed admission to ICU. No recruited patient died. At day 4, patients of Colchicine group presented significant reduction of serum C-reactive protein compared to baseline (p < 0.001). The majority of adverse events were mild and did not lead to patient withdrawal. Diarrhea was more frequent in the Colchicine group (p = 0.17). Cardiac adverse events were absent. DiscussionThe use of colchicine reduced the length of supplemental oxygen therapy and the length of hospitalization. Clinical improvement was in parallel with a reduction on serum levels of C-reactive protein. The drug was safe and well tolerated. Colchicine may be considered a beneficial and not expensive option for COVID-19 treatment. Clinical trials with larger numbers of patients should be conducted to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine as an adjunctive therapy for hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19.

Matching journals

The top 16 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 52%
10.0%
2
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 2%
5.2%
3
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
4.4%
4
Frontiers in Pharmacology
based on 27 papers
Top 0.9%
4.4%
5
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 44%
4.4%
6
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
based on 17 papers
Top 0.2%
2.9%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 5%
2.9%
8
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
based on 18 papers
Top 0.4%
2.3%
9
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 4%
2.3%
10
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
based on 16 papers
Top 0.3%
2.3%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 7%
2.2%
12
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 39%
1.7%
13
eClinicalMedicine
based on 55 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Medicine
based on 29 papers
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 14%
1.5%
16
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
based on 54 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
50% of probability mass above
17
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
based on 10 papers
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
Clinical and Translational Science
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
19
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 13%
1.3%
20
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 8%
1.3%
21
The Lancet Rheumatology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.6%
1.3%
22
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
based on 19 papers
Top 1.0%
1.3%
23
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 11%
1.3%
24
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 15%
1.2%
25
Clinical and Translational Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
26
RMD Open
based on 11 papers
Top 0.6%
1.2%
27
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 8%
1.2%
28
Nutrients
based on 43 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
29
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
30
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.8%