Outcome of COVID-19 with co-existing surgical emergencies in children: our initial experiences and recommendations
Hasan, M. S.; Ali, M. A.; Huq, U.
Show abstract
BackgroundCOVID-19 has changed the practice of surgery vividly all over the world. Pediatric surgery is not an exception. Prioritization protocols allowing us to provide emergency surgical care to the children in need while controlling the pandemic spread. The aim of this study is to share our experiences with the outcome of children with COVID-19 who had a co-existing surgical emergency. MethodsThis is a retrospective observational study. We reviewed the epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory data of all patients admitted in our surgery department through the emergency department and later diagnosed to have COVID-19 by RT-PCR. The study duration was 3 months (April 2020 - June 2020). A nasopharyngeal swab was taken from all patients irrespective of symptoms to detect SARS CoV 2 by RT-PCR with the purpose of detecting asymptomatic patients and patients with atypical symptoms. Emergency surgical services were provided immediately without delay and patients with positive test results were isolated according to the hospital protocol. We divided the test positive patients into 4 age groups for the convenience of data analysis. Data were retrieved from hospital records and analyzed using SPSS (version 25) software. Ethical permission was taken from the hospital ethical review board. ResultsTotal patients were 32. Seven (21.9%) of them were neonates. Twenty-four (75%) patients were male. The predominant diagnosis was acute abdomen followed by infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS), myelomeningocele, and intussusception. Only two patients had mild respiratory symptoms (dry cough). Fever was present in 13 (40.6%) patients. Fourteen (43.8%) patients required surgical treatment. The mean duration of hospital stay was 5.5 days. One neonate with ARM died in the post-operative ward due to cardiac arrest. No patient had hypoxemia or organ failure. Seven health care workers (5.51%) including doctors & nurses got infected with SARS Co V2 during this period. ConclusionOur study has revealed a milder course of COVID-19 in children with minimal infectivity even when present in association with emergency surgical conditions. This might encourage a gradual restart to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on childrens surgery.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An effect of the COVID-19 pandemic: significantly more complicated appendicitis due to delayed presentation of patients! 94%
- Risk and outcomes of healthcare-associated infections in three hospitals in Bobo Dioulasso, 2022 (Burkina Faso): a longitudinal study 94%
- Risks for death after admission to pediatric intensive care (PICU) - a comparison with the general population 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality and sustainability of Ethiopias national surgical indicators 93%
- The immediate treatment outcomes and cost estimate for managing clinical measles in children admitted at Mulago Hospital: a retrospective cohort study 92%
- Cost-Effectiveness of a Pediatric Operating Room Installation in Sub-Saharan Africa 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid Clinical Screening and Staging for COVID-19 Severe Outcome A Hospitalization Study in New York City 92%
- Climate influences scrub typhus occurrence in Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India: Analysis of a 15 year dataset 91%
- COMPARISON OF sPLA2-IIA PERFORMANCE WITH HIGH-SENSITIVE CRP, NEUTROPHIL PERCENTAGE, PCT AND LACTATE TO IDENTIFY BACTERIAL INFECTION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early Outpatient Treatment Of COVID-19: A Retrospective Analysis Of 392 Cases In Italy 90%
- Evaluation of triage checklist for mild COVID-19 outpatients in predicting subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalization during isolation period 90%
- Evaluating the Association and Predictability of Complex Medication Regimen Scores with Clinical Outcomes Among the Critically Ill 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.