An integrated, modular approach to data science education in the life sciences
Dill-McFarland, K. A.; Koenig, S. G.; Mazel, F.; Oliver, D.; McEwen, L. M.; Hong, K. Y.; Hallam, S. J.
Show abstract
We live in an increasingly data-driven world, where high-throughput sequencing and mass spectrometry platforms are transforming biology into an information science. This has shifted major challenges in biological research from data generation and processing to interpretation and knowledge translation. However, post-secondary training in bioinformatics, or more generally data science for life scientists, lags behind current demand. In particular, development of accessible, undergraduate data science curricula has potential to improve research and learning outcomes and better prepare students in the life sciences to thrive in public and private sector careers. Here, we describe the Experiential Data science for Undergraduate Cross-Disciplinary Education (EDUCE) initiative, which aims to progressively build data science competency across several years of integrated practice. Through EDUCE, students complete data science modules integrated into required and elective courses augmented with coordinated co-curricular activities. The EDUCE initiative draws on a community of practice consisting of teaching assistants, postdocs, instructors and research faculty from multiple disciplines to overcome several reported barriers to data science for life scientists, including instructor capacity, student prior knowledge, and relevance to discipline-specific problems. Preliminary survey results indicate that even a single module improves student self-reported interest and/or experience in bioinformatics and computer science. Thus, EDUCE provides a flexible and extensible active learning framework for integration of data science curriculum into undergraduate courses and programs across the life sciences. Availability and implementationThe EDUCE teaching and learning framework is accessible at educe-ubc.github.io
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Mastery Rubric for Bioinformatics: supporting design and evaluation of career-spanning education and training 95%
- Biology exams rarely use visual models to engage higher-order cognitive skills 95%
- High School Science Fair: What Students Say -- Mastery, Performance, and Self-Determination Theory 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A CURE for physiological characterization of bacterioplankton in liquid culture 95%
- Methylothon: a versatile course-based high school research experience in microbiology and bioinformatics-- with pink bacteria 95%
- Flying in the Face of Adversity: A Drosophila-based Virtual CURE Provides Semester-long Authentic Research Opportunity to the Flipped Classroom. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- An innovative approach to using an intensive field course to build scientific and professional skills 93%
- QuoVidi : a open-source web application for the organisation of large scale biological treasure hunts 93%
- yEvo: a modular eukaryotic genetics and evolution research experience for high school students 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Design and implementation of an asynchronous online course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE) in computational genomics 96%
- G-OnRamp: Generating genome browsers to facilitate undergraduate-driven collaborative genome annotation 95%
- Catalyzing computational biology research at an academic institute through an interest network 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.