An in-silico study on SARS-CoV-2: Its compatibility with human tRNA pool, and the polymorphism arising in a single lineage over a month
Victor, M.; Das, R.; Ghosh, T.
Show abstract
SARS-CoV-2 has caused a global pandemic that has costed enormous human lives in the recent past. The present study is an investigation of the viral codon adaptation, ORFs stability and tRNA co-adaptation with humans. We observed that for the codon usage bias in viral ssRNA, ORFs have near values of folding free energies and codon adaptation index with mRNAs of the human housekeeping CDS. However, the correlation between the stability of the ORFs in ssRNA and CAI is stronger than the mRNA stability and CAI of HKG, suggesting a greater expression capacity of SARS-CoV-2. Mutational analysis reflects polymorphism in the virus for ORF1ab, surface glycoprotein and nucleocapsid phosphoprotein ORFs. Non-synonymous mutations have shown non-polar substitutions. Out of the twelve mutations nine are for a higher t-RNA copy number. Viruses in general have high mutation rates. To understand the chances of survival for the mutated SARS-CoV-2 we did simulation for synonymous mutations. It resulted in 50% ORFs with higher stability than their native equivalents. Thus, considering only the synonymous mutations the virus can exhibit a lot of polymorphism. Collectively our data provides new insights for SARS-CoV-2 mutations and the human t-RNA compatibility. SignificanceSurvivability of SARS-CoV-2 in humans is essential for its spread. It has overlapping genes exhibiting a high codon optimization with humans even after a higher codon usage bias. They seem to possess cognizance for high copy number t-RNA (cognate or near-cognate) in humans, while mutating. Even though, it has been well established that native transcripts posses the highest stability, our in-silico studies show that SARS-CoV-2 under mutations give rise to ORFs with higher stability. These results significantly present the viruss ability and the credibility of survival for the mutants. Despite its focus on a geographical location it explains the ongoing behavior of SARS-CoV-2 for a steady existence in humans as all the different lineages have a common origin. Wuhan, China.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2: Proof of recombination between strains and emergence of possibly more virulent ones 97%
- In silico comparative genomics of SARS-CoV-2 to determine the source and diversity of the pathogen in Bangladesh 95%
- Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis of Spike D614G Mutation Reveals Unique SARS-CoV-2 Lineages of B.1.524 and AU.2 in Malaysia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational analysis of the adaptability of H9N2 avian influenza virus: A comparative docking simulation study 95%
- Interaction of the spike protein RBD from SARS-CoV-2 with ACE2: similarity with SARS-CoV, hot-spot analysis and effect of the receptor polymorphism 95%
- Genes for tRNA recycling are upregulated in response to infection with Theiler's mouse encephalitis virus 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular features similarities between SARS-CoV-2, SARS, MERS and key human genes could favour the viral infections and trigger collateral effects 96%
- Sequence analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genome reveals features important for vaccine design 96%
- Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant JN.1 in Tamil Nadu, India - Clinical Characteristics and Novel Mutations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mutational spectra of SARS-CoV-2 orf1ab polyprotein and Signature mutations in the United States of America 96%
- Omicron (BA.1) and Sub-Variants (BA.1, BA.2 and BA.3) of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Infectivity and Pathogenicity: A Comparative Sequence and Structural-based Computational Assessment 95%
- Omicron and Delta Variant of SARS-CoV-2: A Comparative Computational Study of Spike protein 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.