Back

The assessment of Computer Vision Algorithms for the Diagnosis of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma in Surgical Specimens

Bukhari, S. U. K.; Mehtab, U.; Hussain, S. S.; Syed, A.; Armaghan, S. U.; Shah, S. S. H.

2020-07-17 pathology
10.1101/2020.07.14.20152116 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionProstatic malignancy is a major cause of morbidity and fatality among men around the globe. More than a million new cases of prostatic cancer are diagnoses annually. The incidence of prostatic malignancy is rising and it is expected that more than two million new cases of prostatic carcinoma will be diagnosed in 2040. The application of machine learning to assist the histopathologists could be a very valuable adjunct tool for the histological diagnosis of prostatic malignant tumors. Aim & ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence for the histopathological diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma by analyzing the digitized pathology slides. Materials & MethodsEight hundred and two (802) images in total, were obtained from the anonymised slides stained with hematoxylin and eosin which included anonymised 337 images of prostatic adenocarcinoma and 465 anonymised images of nodular hyperplasia of prostate. Eighty percent (80%) of the total digital images were used for training and 20% for testing. Three ResNet architectures ResNet-18, ResNet-34, and ResNet-50 were employed for the analysis of these images. ResultsThe evaluation of digital images by ResNet-18, ResNet-34, and ResNet-50 revealed the diagnostic accuracy of 97.1%, 98 % and 99.5 % respectively. DiscussionThe application of artificial intelligence is being considered as a very useful tool which may improve the patient care by improving the diagnostic accuracy and reducing the cost. In radiology, the application of deep learning to interpret radiological images has revealed excellent results. In the present study, the analysis of pathology images by convolutional neural network architecture revealed the diagnostic accuracy of 97.1%, 98 % and 99.5 % with by ResNet-18, ResNet-34, and ResNet-50 respectively. The findings of the present study are in accordance with the other published series, which were carried out to determine the accuracy of machine learning for the diagnosis of cancers of lung, breast and prostate. The application of deep learning for the histological diagnosis of malignant tumors could be quite helpful in improving the patient care. ConclusionThe findings of the present study suggest that intelligent vision system possibly a worthwhile tool for the histopathological evaluation of prostatic tissue to differentiate between the benign and malignant disorders.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.2%
3
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.1%
5
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
6
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
7
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Journal of Computational Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
16
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
17
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
20
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
21
Bioscience Reports
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
22
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%