Back

Sleep quality, mental health and circadian rhythms during COVID lockdown: Results from the SleepQuest Study

Carrigan, N.; Wearn, A. R.; Meky, S.; Selman, J.; Piggins, H.; Turner, N.; Greenwood, R.; Coulthard, E.

2020-07-10 neurology
10.1101/2020.07.08.20148171 medRxiv
Show abstract

Behavioural responses to COVID-19 lockdown will define the long-term impact of psychological stressors on sleep and brain health. Here we tease apart factors that help protect against sleep disturbance. We capitalise on the unique restrictions during COVID-19 to understand how time of day of daylight exposure and outside exercise interact with chronotype and sleep quality. 3474 people from the UK (median age 62, range 18-91) completed our online SleepQuest Study between 29th April and 13th May 2020 - a set of validated questionnaires probing sleep quality, depression, anxiety and attitudes to sleep alongside bespoke questions on the effect of COVID-19 lockdown on sleep, time spent outside and exercising and self-help sleep measures. Significantly more people (n=1252) reported worsened than improved sleep (n=562) during lockdown (p<0.0001). Factors significantly associated with worsened sleep included low mood (p<0.001), anxiety (p<0.001) and suspected, proven or at risk of COVID-19 symptoms (all p<0.03). Sleep improvement was related to the increased length of time spent outside (P<0.01). Older peoples sleep quality was less affected than younger people by COVID lockdown (p<0.001). Better sleep quality was associated with going outside and exercising earlier, rather than later, in the day. However, the benefit of being outside early is driven by improved sleep in owl (p=0.0002) and not lark (p=0.27) chronotype, whereas, the benefit of early exercise (inside or outside) did not depend on chronotype. Defining the interaction between chronotype, mental health and behaviour will be critical for targeted lifestyle adaptations to protect brain health through current and future crises.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.4%
2
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
6
SLEEP
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
11
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
12
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
13
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
14
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
15
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
18
Psychoneuroendocrinology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
20
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
22
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%