Global Assessment of the Relationship between Government Response Measures and COVID-19 Deaths
Hale, T.; Hale, A. J.; Kira, B.; Petherick, A.; Phillips, T.; Sridhar, D.; Thompson, R.; Webster, S.; Angrist, N.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo provide an early global assessment of the impact of government stringency measures on the rate of growth in deaths from COVID-19. We hypothesized that the overall stringency of a governments interventions and the speed of implementation would affect the growth and level of deaths related to COVID-19 in that country. DesignObservational study based on an original database of global governmental responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Daily data was collected on a range of containment and closure policies for 170 countries from January 1, 2020 until May 27, 2020 by a team of researchers at Oxford University, UK. These data were combined into an aggregate stringency index (SI) score for each country on each day (range: 0-100). Regression was used to show correlations between the speed and strength of government stringency and deaths related to COVID-19 with a number of controls for time and country-specific demographic, health system, and economic characteristics. InterventionsNine non-pharmaceutical interventions such as school and work closures, restrictions on international and domestic travel, public gathering bans, public information campaigns, as well as testing and contact tracing policies. Main outcomes measuresThe primary outcome was deaths related to COVID-19, measured both in terms of maximum daily deaths and growth rate of daily deaths. ResultsFor each day of delay to reach an SI 40, the average daily growth rate in deaths was 0.087 percentage points higher (0.056 to 0.118, P<0.001). In turn, each additional point on the SI was associated with a 0.080 percentage point lower average daily growth rate (-0.121 to -0.039, P<.001). These daily differences in growth rates lead to large cumulative differences in total deaths. For example, a week delay in enacting policy measures to SI 40 would lead to 1.7 times as many deaths overall. ConclusionsA lower degree of government stringency and slower response times were associated with more deaths from COVID-19. These findings highlight the importance of non-pharmaceutical responses to COVID-19 as more robust testing, treatment, and vaccination measures are developed.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The health sector cost of different policy responses to COVID-19 in low- and middle- income countries 91%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and response on the utilisation of health services during the first wave in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo 91%
- An in-depth statistical analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic’s initial spread in the WHO African region 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The relative effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on early Covid-19 mortality: natural experiment in 130 countries 94%
- Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and deaths: cross-national natural experiment in 32 European countries 93%
- On the effectiveness of COVID-19 restrictions and lockdowns: Pan metron ariston 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The global viralization of policies to contain the spreading of the COVID-19 pandemic: analyses of school closures and first reported cases. 92%
- Recommended distances for physical distancing during COVID-19 pandemics reveal cultural connections between countries 91%
- Variation in English Covid booster uptake 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pre-pandemic national immunisation programme strength and health workforce capacity improved routine immunisation resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
- Factors influencing the COVID-19 daily deaths peak across European countries 90%
- Public health information on COVID-19 for international travellers: Lessons learned from a rapid mixed-method evaluation in the UK containment phase 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Deep Recurrent Reinforced Learning model to compare the efficacy of targeted local vs. national measures on the spread of COVID-19 in the UK 91%
- Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment 91%
- Modelling the impact of lockdown easing measures on cumulative COVID-19 cases and deaths in England 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.