Back

Quantification of Epicardial Fat Volume as a Novel Cardiovascular Risk Marker in Asymptomatic Subjects for Early Detection of Cardiovascular Disease

El Shahawy, M.; Izadi, L.; Sabatini, A.; Tucker, S.; Patella, J.; El Shahawy, O.; Yturralde, F.

2020-06-29 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.06.28.20141622 medRxiv
Show abstract

Epicardial fat volume (EFV), also known as epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), sometimes acts as a protector against heart problems; however, in excess volume was found to be associated with cardiovascular structural and functional abnormalities. This study aims to establish a threshold between normal and abnormal values for EFV/EAT in asymptomatic subjects, as well as to assess whether excess EFV/EAT is associated with significant structural and functional abnormalities, including coronary artery calcium score (CACS). A total of 220 asymptomatic patients, were screened utilizing Early Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score (ECVDRS), and CT for CACS and EFV/EAT quantification. Out of the 220 subjects, 69 had a 0 CACS and were included in this analysis. These 69 were then further categorized into 3 groups: Group 1 (Normal subjects; n=20) with ECVDRS < 3, and ACC/AHA risk score < 5%; Group 2 (n= 16) with elevated EFV/EAT and no abdominal visceral obesity; Group 3 (n=33) with elevated EFV/EAT and abdominal visceral obesity. The average EFV/EAT was identified to be 69 cm3 {+/-} 20 in females and 68 cm3 {+/-} 15 in males among Group 1, which indicate the normal values for EFV/EAT. It was also found that elevated EFV/EAT without (Group 2) or with (Group 3) abdominal visceral adiposity was associated with significant vascular abnormalities, as compared to the normal group among these populations of asymptomatic patients with 0 CACS. Elevated EFV/EAT is a novel cardiovascular risk marker regardless of gender, which might be the culprit for major cardiovascular risk factors.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.