A Time Series Analysis of Trends in Medicare Utilization and Reimbursement for Cancer Immunotherapy Drugs: 2012-2017
Puri, P.; Cortese, D.; Baliga, S.
Show abstract
The adoption of immunotherapy has dramatically transformed the landscape of oncology, and improved the prognosis of patients diagnosed with metastatic malignancies. Fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare is the largest payer in the U.S, and pays for physician-administered oncolytics through its medical Part B benefit. However, to the best of our knowledge, trends in Medicare utilization and expenditures for cancer immunotherapy have yet to be described. The aim of this study was to describe trends in Medicare immunotherapy reimbursement. We utilized the public Drugs@FDA database to identify all immunotherapy drugs that were approved by the FDA for solid and hematological cancers in adults as of December 31, 2017. The Medicare Physician Supplier and Other Provider Public Use File (POSPUF) provides reimbursement and utilization data on all services and procedures provided to Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Using the Medicare POSPUF, we aggregated the volume of services, average Medicare reimbursement, and the number of distinct patients receiving each immunotherapy drug from January 2012 to December 2017. The number of Medicare reimbursed cancer immunotherapy drugs increased from 3 in 2012 to 12 in 2017. Over this time period, the number of patients receiving immunotherapy administrations increased 88% from 59,506 to 111,577. Similarly, the number of drug administrations increased by 2,412% from 2,338,691 to 58,752,804. From 2012 to 2017, total Medicare expenditure on cancer immunotherapy drugs increased 154% from $771,434,031 to $1,962,279,164. Medicare expenditure on cancer immunotherapy drugs accounted for 26% of the increase in total Medicare Part B drug expenditures over this time period.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Survival benefits of cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: evidence from a SEER-based retrospective cohort study 92%
- Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of chemotherapy and add-on Viscum album L. therapy compared to chemotherapy alone in the treatment of stage IV NSCLC patients 92%
- Changes in the tumor microenvironment and treatment outcome in glioblastoma: A pilot study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Missing data in the medical record for oncology patients: prevalence and association with outcomes 94%
- Use of Skin Cancer Procedures, Medicare Reimbursement, and Overall Expenditures, 2012-2017 92%
- COVID-19 outcomes, risk factors and associations by race: a comprehensive analysis using electronic health records data in Michigan Medicine 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 93%
- Comprehensive analysis of potential immunotherapy genomic biomarkers in 1,000 Chinese patients with cancer 92%
- Compassionate use of recombinant human IL-7-hyFc as a salvage treatment for restoring lymphopenia in patients with recurrent glioblastoma 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning for prediction of immunotherapy efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer from simple clinical and biological data 91%
- NDRG1 expression is an independent prognostic factor in inflammatory breast cancer 91%
- Development of a Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Prognostic risk Score (MUMPS) for use in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Criteria-based curation of a therapy-focused compendium to support treatment recommendations in precision oncology 92%
- Benefits of local consolidative treatment in oligometastases of solid cancers: a stepwise-hierarchical pooled analysis and systematic review 90%
- Survival-Inferred Fragility of Statistical Significance in Phase III Oncology Trials 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.