Back

A Time Series Analysis of Trends in Medicare Utilization and Reimbursement for Cancer Immunotherapy Drugs: 2012-2017

Puri, P.; Cortese, D.; Baliga, S.

2020-06-30 oncology
10.1101/2020.06.27.20141721 medRxiv
Show abstract

The adoption of immunotherapy has dramatically transformed the landscape of oncology, and improved the prognosis of patients diagnosed with metastatic malignancies. Fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare is the largest payer in the U.S, and pays for physician-administered oncolytics through its medical Part B benefit. However, to the best of our knowledge, trends in Medicare utilization and expenditures for cancer immunotherapy have yet to be described. The aim of this study was to describe trends in Medicare immunotherapy reimbursement. We utilized the public Drugs@FDA database to identify all immunotherapy drugs that were approved by the FDA for solid and hematological cancers in adults as of December 31, 2017. The Medicare Physician Supplier and Other Provider Public Use File (POSPUF) provides reimbursement and utilization data on all services and procedures provided to Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Using the Medicare POSPUF, we aggregated the volume of services, average Medicare reimbursement, and the number of distinct patients receiving each immunotherapy drug from January 2012 to December 2017. The number of Medicare reimbursed cancer immunotherapy drugs increased from 3 in 2012 to 12 in 2017. Over this time period, the number of patients receiving immunotherapy administrations increased 88% from 59,506 to 111,577. Similarly, the number of drug administrations increased by 2,412% from 2,338,691 to 58,752,804. From 2012 to 2017, total Medicare expenditure on cancer immunotherapy drugs increased 154% from $771,434,031 to $1,962,279,164. Medicare expenditure on cancer immunotherapy drugs accounted for 26% of the increase in total Medicare Part B drug expenditures over this time period.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.