Back

Development and External Validation of a Diagnostic Model for Coronary Microvascular Obstruction

Li, Y.; Lyu, S.

2020-07-01 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.06.27.20141416 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPrevention of coronary microvascular obstruction /no-reflow phenomenon(CMVO/NR) is a crucial step in improving prognosis of patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). We wanted to develop and externally validate a diagnostic model of CMVO/NR in patients with acute STEMI underwent PPCI. MethodsDesign: Multivariable logistic regression of a cohort of acute STEMI patients. Setting: Emergency department ward of a university hospital. Participants: Diagnostic model development: Totally 1232 acute STEMI patients who were consecutively treated with PPCI from November 2007 to December 2013. External validation: Totally 1301 acute STEMI patients who were treated with PPCI from January 2014 to June 2018. Outcomes: CMVO/NR during PPCI. Results147(11.9%)patients presented CMVO/NR in the development dataset and 120(9.2%) patients presented CMVO/NR in the validation dataset. The strongest predictors of CMVO/NR were age, periprocedural bradycardia, using thrombus aspiration devices during procedure and total occlusion of culprit vessel. We developed a diagnostic model of CMVO/NR.The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.6833 in the development set.We constructed a nomogram using the development database.The AUC was 0.6547 in the validation set. Discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis were satisfactory. ConclusionsWe developed and externally validated a diagnostic model of CMVO/NR during PPCI. We registered this study with WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform on 16 May 2019. Registration number: ChiCTR1900023213. http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=39057&htm=4.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.