Strengthening The Organizing and Reporting of Microbiome Studies (STORMS)
Mirzayi, C. A.; Renson, A.; Zohra, F.; Elsafoury, S.; Geistlinger, L.; Kasselman, L.; Eckenrode, K.; van de Wijgert, J. H.; Loughman, A.; Marques, F.; STORMS Consortium, ; Genomic Standards Consortium, ; Massive Analysis and Quality Control Society, ; Segata, N.; Beghini, F.; Huttenhower, C.; Dowd, J. B.; Jones, H.; Waldron, L. D.
Show abstract
BackgroundHuman microbiome research is a growing field with the potential for improving our understanding and treatment of diseases and other conditions. The field is interdisciplinary, making concise organization and reporting of results across different styles of epidemiology, biology, bioinformatics, translational medicine, and statistics a challenge. Commonly used reporting guidelines for observational or genetic epidemiology studies lack key features specific to microbiome studies. MethodsA multidisciplinary group of microbiome epidemiology researchers reviewed elements of available reporting guidelines for observational and genetic studies and adapted these for application to culture-independent human microbiome studies. New reporting elements were developed for laboratory, bioinformatic, and statistical analyses tailored to microbiome studies, and other parts of these checklists were streamlined to keep reporting manageable. ResultsSTORMS is a 17-item checklist for reporting on human microbiome studies, organized into six sections covering typical sections of a scientific publication, presented as a table with space for author-provided details and intended for inclusion in supplementary materials. ConclusionsSTORMS provides guidance for authors and standardization for interdisciplinary microbiome studies, facilitating complete and concise reporting and augments information extraction for downstream applications. AvailabilityThe STORMS checklist is available as a versioned spreadsheet from https://www.stormsmicrobiome.org/.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Child health, nutrition and gut microbiota development during the first two years of life; study protocol of a prospective cohort study from the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan 92%
- The effect of balanced energy-protein supplementation provided to lactating women on maternal and infant outcomes: study protocol for a prospectively planned individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis 90%
- A cross-sectional audit and survey of Open Science and Data Sharing practices at The Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Microbiota based personalized nutrition improves hyperglycaemia and hypertension parameters and reduces inflammation: A prospective, open label, controlled, randomized, comparative, proof of concept study 91%
- Uncovering the microbiome of invasive sympatric European brown hares and European rabbits in Australia 90%
- Ursolic acid improves the bacterial community mapping of the intestinal tract in liver fibrosis mice 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring the Role of Microbiome in Susceptibility, Treatment Response and Outcome among Tuberculosis Patients from Pakistan; Study Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study (Micro-STOP) 92%
- Protocol for the PATHOME Study: A Cohort Study on Urban Societal Development and the Ecology of Enteric Disease Transmission among Infants, Domestic Animals, and the Environment 91%
- Wearable Sensing in Eating Episode Monitoring: An Updated Systematic Review Protocol 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.