Patterns of IgM Binding to Tumor-Associated Antigen Peptides Correlate with the Type of Brain Tumors
Ferdinandov, D. V.; Kostov, V. M.; Hadzhieva, M. Y.; Shivarov, V. S.; Bussarsky, A. V.; Pashov, A. D.
Show abstract
The immune system can be used as a biosensor of the internal environment. Changes in the reactivities of the antibody repertoire can be used as a readout for a wide range of disturbances including various inflammatory conditions and malignant tumors. Extending our previous work based on IgM mimotope libraries, here we report our studies on the interpretability of profiles of IgM reactivities to a library of natural 15-mer peptides derived from 20 tumor associated antigens and 193 linear B cell epitopes involved in tumor pathogenesis. Sera from 21 patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM, n=10), brain metastases of other tumors (n=5) and non-tumor bearing neurosurgery patients (n=6) were used to probe their IgM reactivity with an array of 4526 peptide sequences. Using feature selection algorithms, we were able to extract profiles that separated well the three diagnostic groups with accuracy of up to 0.9. A key feature of the profiles extracted was their size (138 peptides for differentiating GBM and 340 - for tumor bearing patients) and origin from practically all tested antigens. Comparable numbers of reactivities were gained or lost in tumor bearing patients. A minimal set of the most significant 41 reactivities from 16 antigens contained disproportionately large number of epitopes from stromelysine-3 and erbB2 receptor with some of the reactivities gained and other lost in cancer patients. Epitopes from human papilloma virus 16 and HTLV-1 were included too. Some of the reactivities were readily interpretable both as antigen source and structural context (signal peptides). The interpretation of the rest requires further confirmatory studies. Thus, a set of natural peptides from tumor antigens readily provides profile of interpretable IgM reactivities which can serve as classifiers for clinically relevant patient stratification.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards middle-up analysis of polyclonal antibodies: subclass-specific N-glycosylation profiling of murine immunoglobulin G (IgG) by means of HPLC-MS 92%
- COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates: Prediction and Validation of 174 SARS-CoV-2 Epitopes 92%
- In silico tool for Predicting, Designing and Scanning IL-2 inducing peptides 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular Landscape of Anti-Drug Antibodies Reveals the Mechanism of the Immune Response Following Treatment with TNF-alpha Antagonists 93%
- Polyreactivity of antibodies from different B cell subpopulations is determined by distinct sequence patterns of variable region 92%
- Accurate MHC Motif Deconvolution of Immunopeptidomics Data Reveals a Significant Contribution of DRB3, 4 and 5 to the Total DR Immunopeptidome 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determination of IgG1 and IgG3 SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nucleocapsid binding – Who is binding who and why? 91%
- InCytokine, an open-source software, reveals a TREM2 variant specific cytokine signature 91%
- Data independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS) analysis of FFPE rectal cancer samples offers in depth proteomics characterization of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Framework for analyzing MAE-derived immunopeptidomes from cell lines with shared HLA haplotypes 92%
- Scoping review of the applications of peptide microarrays on the fight against human infections. 92%
- A novel assessment method for COVID-19 humoral immunity duration using serial measurements in naturally infected and vaccinated subjects 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.1.7 caused HLA-A2+ CD8+ T cell epitope mutations for impaired cellular immune response 91%
- A method for rapid nanobody screening with no bias of the library diversity 90%
- Both COVID-19 infection and vaccination induce high-affinity cross-clade responses to SARS-CoV-2 variants 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.