Impact of social distancing measures for preventing coronavirus disease 2019 : A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Regmi, K.; Lwin, C. M.
Show abstract
IntroductionSocial distancing measures (SDMs) protect public health from the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the impact of SDMs has been inconsistent and unclear. This study aims to assess the effects of SDMs (e.g. isolation, quarantine) for reducing the transmission of COVID-19. Methods and analysisWe will conduct a systematic review meta-analysis research of both randomised controlled trials and non-randomised controlled trials. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, Allied & Complementary Medicine, COVID-19 Research and WHO database on COVID-19 for primary studies assessing the effects of SDMs (e.g. isolation, quarantine) for reducing the transmission of COVID-19, and will be reported in accordance with PRISMA statement. The PRISMA-P checklist will be used while preparing this protocol. We will use Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines (JBI Critical Appraisal Checklists) to assess the methodological qualities and synthesised performing thematic analysis. Two reviewers will independently screen the papers and extracted data. If sufficient data are available, the random-effects model for meta-analysis will be performed to measure the effect size of SDMs or the strengths of relationships. To assess the heterogeneity of effects, I2 together with the observed effects (Q-value, with degrees of freedom) will be used to provide the true effects in the analysis. Ethics and disseminationEthics approval and consent will not be required for this systematic review of the literature as it does not involve human participation. We will be able to disseminate the study findings using the following strategies: we will be publishing at least one paper in peer-reviewed journals, and an abstract will be presented at suitable national/international conferences or workshops. We will also share important information with public health authorities as well as with the World Health Organization. In addition, we may post the submitted manuscript under review to bioRxiv, medRxiv, or other relevant pre-print servers. Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LITo our knowledge, this study will be the first systematic review to examine the impact of social distancing measures to reduce transmission of COVID-19. C_LIO_LIThis study will offer highest level of evidence for informed decisions, drawing a broader framework. C_LIO_LIThis protocol reduces the possibility of duplication, provides transparency to the methods and procedures that will be used, minimise potential biases and allows peer-review. C_LIO_LIThis research is not externally funded, and therefore time and resource will be constrained. C_LIO_LIIf included studies will be variable in sample size, quality and population, which may open to bias, and the heterogeneity of data will preclude a meaningful meta-analysis to measure the impact of specific SDMs C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Scalability of mobile technology interventions in the prevention and management of HIV among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review 92%
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 92%
- Community Engagement to support COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake: A living systematic review protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 94%
- Individual Participant Data Network Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for survivors of intimate partner violence: Study protocol 92%
- Laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infection triggers for acute myocardial infarction and stroke: systematic review protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Public engagement and crowdfunding for health research: A global qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot 91%
- Community engagement for COVID-19 prevention and control: A Rapid Evidence Synthesis 91%
- The remaining unknowns: A mixed methods study of the current and global health research priorities for COVID-19 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Multicenter preclinical studies as an innovative method to enhance translation: a systematic review of published studies 89%
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research 88%
- The effect of variation of individual infectiousness on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in households 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.